Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100. Vascular contributions

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

In Reply. —The analyses of Drs Mirra and Gearing indicate that brain infarcts are not associated with NFTs in the neocortex. Our analyses also indicated that brain infarcts were not associated with the number of NFTs, senile plaques, or neuritic plaques in the neocortex, suggesting that AD lesions and brain infarcts were likely to have occured independently of each other. While AD and brain infarction may represent separate disease processes, their combination may nonetheless increase the likelihood that dementia will occur. Among the participants in our study who met our neuropathologic criteria for AD (ie, abundant senile plaques and some NFTs in the neocortex), those with 1 or 2 lacunar infarcts in the basal ganglia, thalamus, or deep white matter had an especially high prevalence of dementia, compared with those without brain infarcts. The prevalence of dementia was 93% for those with such subcortical lacunar infarcts and 57% in those without infarcts.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Snowdon, D. A. (1997). Brain Infarction and the Clinical Expression of Alzheimer Disease-Reply. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550020046024

Vancouver

Snowdon DA. Brain Infarction and the Clinical Expression of Alzheimer Disease-Reply. JAMA. 1997. doi:10.1001/jama.1997.03550020046024.

BibTeX

@article{snowdon1997-b8bd5c53,
  author  = {Snowdon, David A.},
  title   = {{Brain Infarction and the Clinical Expression of Alzheimer Disease-Reply}},
  journal = {JAMA},
  year    = {1997},
  doi     = {10.1001/jama.1997.03550020046024},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1997.03550020046024}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Why it matters

In this reply letter, the authors report that brain infarcts were not associated with the number of tangles or plaques in the neocortex, suggesting the two occur independently. Among participants who met their criteria for Alzheimer's, dementia prevalence was 93% in those with subcortical lacunar infarcts and 57% in those without.

How this study scored 47/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 10 of 10; Journal's citation record 4 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence left out, no data; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 6 of 7; Citations per year 4 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 3 of 4; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 43 of the 92 points it could be judged on, which is 47 of 100. Total 47 of 100.43 of the 92 points we could judge = 47 of 100

Published in a top-tier journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on strength of evidence and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 43 of the 92 points we could judge it on, which is 47 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 10 / 10 Tier 1 — top-tier general journal (JAMA)
Journal's citation record 4 / 4 JAMA: journal h-index 1,011 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence — / 5 No evidence rating recorded — left out of this score
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 1997 — older than 20 years, still counted
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 6 / 7 Cited 675 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 4 / 5 21.8 citations a year over 31 year(s) since 1997
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 15.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 3 / 4 Last-listed author David A. Snowdon: h-index 51 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 43 / 92 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 43 of the 92 points we could judge it on is 47 out of 100.
Total 47 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Related studies in Vascular contributions

Also in Vascular contributions

53 studies in the library are filed under Vascular contributions with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Vascular contributions hub.

Similar studies

More on Vascular contributions

See all studies in Vascular contributions →