Home › Research › Risk factors
Be a Super Shopper!
Norah MacKendrick. Better Safe Than Sorry, 2018-05-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
This chapter examines how grocery stores and Whole Foods Market in particular, have driven the rise of precautionary consumption. It takes the reader through a Whole Foods Market store to understand how the company both cultivates anxiety about toxics, and promises to protect consumers from harmful substances in their food and personal care products. The chapter then turns to the product package, viewing it as powerful mechanism driving precautionary consumption. While Whole Foods Market is not the only market actor encouraging precautionary consumption, the company has helped to mark the grocery store as a site where a new, much more encompassing form of precautionary consumption is possible.
Key findings
- This chapter examines how grocery stores and Whole Foods Market in particular, have driven the rise of precautionary consumption.
- It takes the reader through a Whole Foods Market store to understand how the company both cultivates anxiety about toxics, and promises to protect consumers from harmful substances in their food and personal care products.
- The chapter then turns to the product package, viewing it as powerful mechanism driving precautionary consumption.
- While Whole Foods Market is not the only market actor encouraging precautionary consumption, the company has helped to mark the grocery store as a site where a new, much more encompassing form of precautionary consumption is possible.
Why it matters
This chapter discusses how grocery stores, particularly Whole Foods Market, encourage precautionary consumption. It has no relevance to treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Risk factors, ranked →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 25/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 23 of the 93 points we could judge it on, which is 25 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Better Safe Than Sorry) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2018 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 1 / 7 | Cited 1 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 0 / 5 | 0.1 citations a year over 10 year(s) since 2018 |
| Impact for its field and year | 0 / 6 | Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 0 / 4 | Cited 1 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 1 / 4 | Last-listed author Norah A. MacKendrick: h-index 16 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 0 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete) |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 23 / 93 | Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 23 of the 93 points we could judge it on is 25 out of 100. |
| Total | 25 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
MacKendrick, N. (2018). Be a Super Shopper! Better Safe Than Sorry. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520296688.003.0004
Vancouver
MacKendrick N. Be a Super Shopper! Better Safe Than Sorry. 2018. doi:10.1525/california/9780520296688.003.0004.
BibTeX
@article{mackendrick2018-ff072978,
author = {MacKendrick, Norah},
title = {{Be a Super Shopper!}},
journal = {Better Safe Than Sorry},
year = {2018},
doi = {10.1525/california/9780520296688.003.0004},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520296688.003.0004}
}