Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

Latino family caregivers of people with dementia face significant challenges and limited access to support. Community health workers (CHWs) may help deliver culturally tailored education in primary care settings. This qualitative study explored barriers and facilitators to implementing ¡Unidos Podemos! a caregiver support intervention using a comic-style educational booklet, group discussions, and follow-up calls by CHWs. We conducted interviews with 20 CHWs, primary care providers, and clinic staff across the U.S. and analyzed transcripts using deductive methods guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Twenty-one themes emerged across five domains, highlighting enthusiasm for the intervention and its simplicity, particularly the booklet format. Participants recommended addressing logistical challenges including reimbursement for group sessions, staff training, and support infrastructure. Findings offer practical insights to inform future implementation strategies, supporting the integration of CHWs into dementia care for Latino families in primary care.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Jaime, P.-P., Emily, M., Val, R.-D. M., Ton, M., Angela, S., Mariana, R.-M., et al. (2026). Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing a Dementia Family Caregiver Support Strategy Among Latinos in Primary Care. Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648251390013

Vancouver

Jaime P.-P, Emily M, Val R.-DM, Ton M, Angela S, Mariana R.-M, et al. Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing a Dementia Family Caregiver Support Strategy Among Latinos in Primary Care. Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society. 2026. doi:10.1177/07334648251390013. PMID: 41108760.

BibTeX

@article{jaime2026-41108760,
  author  = {Jaime, Perales-Puchalt and Emily, Morrow and Val, Roche-Dean Maria and Ton, Miras and Angela, Scott and Mariana, Ramirez-Mantilla and Ladson, Hinton and Dolores, Gallagher-Thompson and others},
  title   = {{Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing a Dementia Family Caregiver Support Strategy Among Latinos in Primary Care}},
  journal = {Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1177/07334648251390013},
  pmid    = {41108760},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648251390013}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

This qualitative study explored barriers and facilitators to implementing a dementia caregiver support intervention for Latinos in primary care using community health workers. It concerns caregiver support and implementation, not treating, curing, or preventing Alzheimer's disease.

Study details

How this study scored 46/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here left out, no data; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 2 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 33 of the 72 points it could be judged on, which is 46 of 100. Total 46 of 100.33 of the 72 points we could judge = 46 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here and still being cited, so those were left out: it earned 33 of the 72 points we could judge it on, which is 46 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society)
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Journal of Applied Gerontology: journal h-index 92 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 Citation count not trusted: 6 of 11 library studies citing it were published more than a year before it - a sign OpenAlex merged several works under this DOI — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here — / 6 Library citations not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Still being cited — / 4 Citation count not trusted (see above) — left out of this score
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Edward F. Ellerbeck: h-index 48 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Stanford University: institution h-index 2,674 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 2 / 3 OpenAlex lists 4 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41108760)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 33 / 72 Scored on 15 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 33 of the 72 points we could judge it on is 46 out of 100.
Total 46 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

11 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references. Showing the 8 highest-scoring.

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Also tagged “care”

996 studies in the library carry the topic tag “care”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 996 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →