Home › Research › Vascular contributions
Association Between Cardiovascular Disease and Long-term Exposure to Air Pollution With the Risk of Dementia
Grande G, Ljungman PLS, Eneroth K, Bellander T, Rizzuto D.. JAMA neurology, 2020-07-01
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Results At baseline, the mean (SD) age of the 2927 participants was 74.1 (10.7) years, and 1845 (63.0%) were female. Conclusions and relevance This study found that long-term exposure to air pollution was associated with a higher risk of dementia.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Grande, G., Ljungman, P. L. S., Eneroth, K., Bellander, T., & Rizzuto, D. (2020). Association Between Cardiovascular Disease and Long-term Exposure to Air Pollution With the Risk of Dementia. JAMA neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4914
Vancouver
Grande G, Ljungman PLS, Eneroth K, Bellander T, Rizzuto D. Association Between Cardiovascular Disease and Long-term Exposure to Air Pollution With the Risk of Dementia. JAMA neurology. 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4914. PMID: 32227140.
BibTeX
@article{grande2020-32227140,
author = {Grande, G. and Ljungman, P. L. S. and Eneroth, K. and Bellander, T. and Rizzuto, D.},
title = {{Association Between Cardiovascular Disease and Long-term Exposure to Air Pollution With the Risk of Dementia}},
journal = {JAMA neurology},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4914},
pmid = {32227140},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4914}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Results At baseline, the mean (SD) age of the 2927 participants was 74.1 (10.7) years, and 1845 (63.0%) were female.
- Conclusions and relevance This study found that long-term exposure to air pollution was associated with a higher risk of dementia.
Study details
- Study designcohort study
- Participants4,590
- Effect size73.3%; 63.0%; 49.4%
- Evidence strengthModerate
How this study scored 74/100
Published in a leading specialty journal, and it is a cohort study following people over time. Scored zero for randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 43 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 74 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 9 / 10 | Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA neurology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 7 / 12 | A cohort study following people over time |
| Strength of evidence | 3 / 5 | Rated “moderate” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 3 / 4 | 4,590 participants |
| Effect reported | 2 / 3 | Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32227140) |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 43 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 43 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 74 out of 100. |
| Total | 74 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Vascular contributions
Also tagged “biobank”
1,084 studies in the library carry the topic tag “biobank”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,084 tagged studies.