Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 51 out of 100. Genetics

Topic: Brain proteins, microglia and lab models

Among 203 enrolled patients, 186 (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [5.2] years; 119 males [64.0%]) were randomized (137 to the CN-105 group, 49 to the placebo group) and underwent surgery. The rates of grade 2 or higher AEs among patients in the CN-105 and placebo groups were 76.6% and 87.8% (relative risk [RR], 0.87; 95% CI, 0.76-1.00; P = .10). The CN-105 vs placebo group had fewer grade 2 or higher AEs per patient (median [IQR], 1 [1-3] vs 2 [1-5]; P = .03). The percentage of CN-105 doses administered within the time window was 94.6% (860 of 909; 95% CI, 92.9%-96.0%) in the CN-105 group and 93.8% (346 of 369; 95% CI, 90.8%-96.0%) in the placebo group. Among patients in the CN-105 vs placebo group, the postoperative delirium incidence was 19.3% vs 26.5% (odds ratio [OR], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.31-1.42; P = .29); the median (IQR) postoperative delirium severity scores were 1 (1-2) vs 2 (1-2) (P = .19); and the median difference in preoperative to 24-hour postoperative CSF cytokine-level changes were as follows: -0.39 pg/mL (95% CI, -0.93 to 0.14 pg/mL, P = .12) for IL-6, -0.84 pg/mL (95% CI, -3.06 to 1.40 pg/mL; P = .18) for G-CSF,-23.32 pg/mL (95% CI, -94.36 to 44.93 pg/mL; P = .57) for IL-8, and -2.36 pg/mL (95% CI, -58.57 to 58.62 pg/mL; P = .50) for MCP-1. Conclusions and Relevance: In this phase 2 randomized clinical trial of older surgical patients, CN-105 (vs placebo) administration was feasible and did not increase AEs. A phase 3 trial is warranted to further evaluate the efficacy of CN-105 for reducing postoperative AEs and to more precisely determine its effects on postoperative delirium incidence and severity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03802396.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Timko, N. J., Wright, M. C., Reese, M. A., Boykin, P. C., Emerson, J. M., Woldorff, M. G., et al. (2026). Apolipoprotein E Mimetic Peptide CN-105 and Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients. JAMA Network Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.2289

Vancouver

Timko NJ, Wright MC, Reese MA, Boykin PC, Emerson JM, Woldorff MG, et al. Apolipoprotein E Mimetic Peptide CN-105 and Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients. JAMA Network Open. 2026. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.2289. PMID: 41931297.

BibTeX

@article{timko2026-41931297,
  author  = {Timko, Noah J. and Wright, Mary Cooter and Reese, Melody A. and Boykin, Piper C. and Emerson, Jacqueline M. and Woldorff, Marty G. and Eleswarpu, Sarada and Herbert, J. Taylor and others},
  title   = {{Apolipoprotein E Mimetic Peptide CN-105 and Postoperative Delirium in Older Patients}},
  journal = {JAMA Network Open},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.2289},
  pmid    = {41931297},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.2289}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

In this phase 2 randomized trial of older surgical patients, the drug CN-105 did not significantly reduce postoperative delirium compared to placebo. The study was small and preliminary, and the results do not support CN-105 as an effective treatment for delirium in this population.

Study details

How this study scored 51/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record 2 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 4 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 3 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 3 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 51 of 100.51 of 100 points earned49 not earned

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size and studied in people because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (JAMA Network Open)
Journal's citation record 2 / 4 JAMA Network Open: journal h-index 235 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 Design recorded as “clinical trial”, which our rubric does not rank (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 4 / 6 Cited 11.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Howard Levinson: h-index 16 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 3 / 3 Stanford University: institution h-index 2,684 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 3 / 3 OpenAlex lists 15 institution(s) in 5 countries
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41931297)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 51 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Genetics

Also tagged “tdp-43”

1,150 studies in the library carry the topic tag “tdp-43”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,150 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Genetics

See all studies in Genetics →