Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 35 out of 100. Brain scans and imaging

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer's Disease (AD) is a significant neurological condition characterized by progressive cognitive deterioration, with prevalence rising exponentially with age. Currently, there is no effective cure, and the disease progression impacts patients' quality of life, often leading to severe symptoms before death. The gradual development of AD symptoms, often mistaken for typical aging, frequently leads to delayed diagnosis. This underscores the critical need for precise, early diagnostic methodologies, as timely intervention plays a crucial role in managing progression. Accordingly, this paper introduces DeepALZNET, a dual-pathway computational framework designed to enhance AD prediction by offering two independent processing pathways: one for structured clinical data and another for unstructured brain MRI scans. The first pathway combines a 1D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) with a Random Forest classifier to analyze clinical data, while the second employs a transfer-learning-based VGG19 architecture to detect subtle structural changes in MRI scans. Empirical validation on two publicly available datasets (2k clinical cases and 40k MRI images) demonstrated that both pathways achieved competitive accuracy ([Formula: see text]), with further evaluation on ADNI and OASIS benchmarks confirming robustness. Unlike recent transformer-based or attention-driven methods, which often demand large multimodal datasets and high computational resources, DeepALZNET prioritizes practical applicability, interpretability, and adaptability, operating effectively with either clinical or imaging data alone. This design bridges the gap between benchmark-driven research and deployable real-world solutions, with potential for multimodal fusion or attention integration in future work.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study introduces a dual-pathway computational framework for predicting Alzheimer's disease from clinical and MRI data and reports competitive accuracy on public datasets. It is a technical prediction study and does not test any treatment, cure, or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 35/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 1 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 34 of the 96 points it could be judged on, which is 35 of 100. Total 35 of 100.34 of the 96 points we could judge = 35 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record, so that was left out: it earned 34 of the 96 points we could judge it on, which is 35 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Scientific Reports)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 Scientific Reports: journal h-index 463 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 4 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.3 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 2.5× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 1 / 4 Cited 4 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 OpenAlex's profile for last-listed author Sara Farag holds only 3 work(s), too few to judge a track record — left out of this score
Institution's track record 0 / 3 South Valley University: institution h-index 155 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 41345430)
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 34 / 96 Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 34 of the 96 points we could judge it on is 35 out of 100.
Total 35 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Bekhet, S., Saad, N. E. S., & Farag, S. (2025). Alzheimer disease predicting from clinical and MRI data using DeepALZNET dual pathway framework. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-28221-0

Vancouver

Bekhet S, Saad NES, Farag S. Alzheimer disease predicting from clinical and MRI data using DeepALZNET dual pathway framework. Scientific Reports. 2025. doi:10.1038/s41598-025-28221-0. PMID: 41345430.

BibTeX

@article{bekhet2025-41345430,
  author  = {Bekhet, Saddam and Saad, Nagwa Eid Sobhy and Farag, Sara},
  title   = {{Alzheimer disease predicting from clinical and MRI data using DeepALZNET dual pathway framework}},
  journal = {Scientific Reports},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1038/s41598-025-28221-0},
  pmid    = {41345430},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-28221-0}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Brain scans and imaging

Also tagged “classification”

835 studies in the library carry the topic tag “classification”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 835 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Brain scans and imaging

See all studies in Brain scans and imaging →