Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 34 out of 100. Mild cognitive impairment

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

One of the most challenging tasks for neurologists is the early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Early and accurate diagnosis of the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage can enhance efforts to slow down the major consequences linked to this condition. Deep learning systems provide a promising performance in diagnosing the disease through neuroimaging analysis. This research aims to develop a deep learning-based system that efficiently identifies and analyzes the progression from Cognitively Normal (CN) to MCI, addressing the growing need for more accessible, accurate diagnostic tools. The proposed model comprises two distinct feature extraction paths to capture local and global image features. Each path includes advanced modules for feature refinement associated with the channel attention mechanism. The resultant output features are produced using a learned fusion technique from the two paths’ features and applied to the CN vs. MCI binary classifier. Furthermore, the proposed Suspected Subject Classifier (SSC) system applies various machine-learning methods to identify the suspected MCI subjects. The results showed a comparative performance for the binary diagnosis of CN individuals and those with MCI, achieving an accuracy of 91.6% and 88.4% for multi-class diagnoses, including the prediction of progression from normal to confirmed MCI. This study represents an exceptional stride toward predicting early MCI in normal individuals. By enhancing prediction efficiency for early disease progression in normal individuals, our method can potentially advance intervention strategies and improve patient care outcomes.

Key findings

Why it matters

This study developed a deep learning system using MRI features that achieved 91.6% accuracy for distinguishing cognitively normal individuals from those with MCI and 88.4% for multi-class diagnoses including predicting progression from normal to confirmed MCI. The work is a diagnostic tool development and does not test any treatment or prevention.

Study details

How this study scored 34/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 3 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 1 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. Total 34 of 100.34 of 100 points earned66 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (IEEE Access)
Journal's citation record 3 / 4 IEEE Access: journal h-index 380 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 1 / 7 Cited 2 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.7 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.3× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 2 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Reza Afrouzian: h-index 8 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 University of Tabriz: institution h-index 287 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Total 34 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Baktash, A. Q., Sarbaz, Y., Meshgini, S., & Afrouzian, R. (2025). Advancing Early Diagnosis: Predicting Mild Cognitive Impairment Progression in Normal Individuals Using Deep Learning on MRI Features. IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3588801

Vancouver

Baktash AQ, Sarbaz Y, Meshgini S, Afrouzian R. Advancing Early Diagnosis: Predicting Mild Cognitive Impairment Progression in Normal Individuals Using Deep Learning on MRI Features. IEEE Access. 2025. doi:10.1109/access.2025.3588801.

BibTeX

@article{baktash2025-dec3cad3,
  author  = {Baktash, Abdullah Qassim and Sarbaz, Yashar and Meshgini, Saeed and Afrouzian, Reza},
  title   = {{Advancing Early Diagnosis: Predicting Mild Cognitive Impairment Progression in Normal Individuals Using Deep Learning on MRI Features}},
  journal = {IEEE Access},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.1109/access.2025.3588801},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3588801}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Mild cognitive impairment

Also tagged “assessment”

840 studies in the library carry the topic tag “assessment”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 840 tagged studies.

Similar studies

More on Mild cognitive impairment

See all studies in Mild cognitive impairment →