Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
Patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type frequently have difficulty performing visual tasks. These difficulties may be due, at least partially, to degenerative changes in both the primary visual pathway and the visual association areas. To determine whether retinal ganglion cell dysfunction contributes to visual loss in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type, we tested a group of patients with this disease (n = 13) using the pattern-reversal electroretinogram to both low (4.0 reversals per second) and high (16.0 reversals per second) temporal frequency checkerboard patterns (1.0 degree checks). Significant amplitude reductions were noted for the patients relative to age-matched control subjects (n = 30). In addition, the observed amplitude reductions were most pronounced for the high temporal frequency condition. Therefore, the results are consistent with retinal ganglion cell dysfunction and support the notion that optic nerve damage induced by senile dementia of the Alzheimer type preferentially affects the larger, faster-conducting retinal ganglion cells along with their retinocortical projections.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Trick, G. L., Barris, M. C., & Bickler-Bluth, M. (1989). Abnormal pattern electroretinograms in patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Annals of neurology. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410260208
Vancouver
Trick GL, Barris MC, Bickler-Bluth M. Abnormal pattern electroretinograms in patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Annals of neurology. 1989. doi:10.1002/ana.410260208. PMID: 2774510.
BibTeX
@article{trick1989-2774510,
author = {Trick, G. L. and Barris, M. C. and Bickler-Bluth, M.},
title = {{Abnormal pattern electroretinograms in patients with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type}},
journal = {Annals of neurology},
year = {1989},
doi = {10.1002/ana.410260208},
pmid = {2774510},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410260208}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Significant amplitude reductions were noted for the patients relative to age-matched control subjects (n = 30).
- Therefore, the results are consistent with retinal ganglion cell dysfunction and support the notion that optic nerve damage induced by senile dementia of the Alzheimer type preferentially affects the larger, faster-conducting retinal ganglion cells along with their retinocortical projections.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Brain scans & tests →
Study details
- Participants13
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 47/100
Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 27 of the 58 points we could judge it on, which is 47 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 9 / 10 | Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Annals of neurology) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 1989 — older than 20 years, still counted |
| Sample size | 1 / 4 | 13 participants |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 3 / 3 | Studied in people (participant count stated) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 2774510) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 27 / 58 | Scored on 11 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 27 of the 58 points we could judge it on is 47 out of 100. |
| Total | 47 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related studies in Brain scans and imaging
Also tagged “abnormal”
6 studies in the library carry the topic tag “abnormal”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 6 tagged studies.