Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100. Treatments

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Results The greatest advantage of the RSD proposed in this article is its ability to critically address the question on a DM effect.

Key findings

Why it matters

This paper proposes a new trial design for studying whether a treatment modifies the course of Alzheimer's disease. It is a methodological proposal and reports no treatment results.

Study details

How this study scored 50/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 1 of 4; Study design 7 of 12; Strength of evidence 5 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 1 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited 3 of 7; Citations per year 1 of 5; Impact for its field and year 2 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 2 of 4; Institution's track record 1 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 1 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 50 of 100.50 of 100 points earned50 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal, and it is a longitudinal study following the same people over time. Scored zero for effect reported because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Clinical trials (London, England))
Journal's citation record 1 / 4 Clinical Trials: journal h-index 93 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 7 / 12 A longitudinal study following the same people over time
Strength of evidence 5 / 5 Rated “high” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 1 / 5 2011 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 1,000 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited 3 / 7 Cited 21 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 1 / 5 1.2 citations a year over 17 year(s) since 2011
Impact for its field and year 2 / 6 Cited 1.4× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 2 / 4 Last-listed author Steven J. Romano: h-index 21 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 1 / 3 Weill Cornell Medicine: institution h-index 1,163 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 1 / 3 OpenAlex lists 2 institution(s) in 1 country
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 21335586)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 50 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

May need a subscription Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 10 Oct 2026), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Zhang, R. Y., Leon, A. C., Chuang-Stein, C., & Romano, S. J. (2011). A new proposal for randomized start design to investigate disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease. Clinical trials (London, England). https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774510392255

Vancouver

Zhang RY, Leon AC, Chuang-Stein C, Romano SJ. A new proposal for randomized start design to investigate disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease. Clinical trials (London, England). 2011. doi:10.1177/1740774510392255. PMID: 21335586.

BibTeX

@article{zhang2011-21335586,
  author  = {Zhang, R. Y. and Leon, A. C. and Chuang-Stein, C. and Romano, S. J.},
  title   = {{A new proposal for randomized start design to investigate disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer disease}},
  journal = {Clinical trials (London, England)},
  year    = {2011},
  doi     = {10.1177/1740774510392255},
  pmid    = {21335586},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1177/1740774510392255}
}

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Related studies in Treatments

Similar studies

More on Treatments

See all studies in Treatments →