alzhub.org
Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Research

30,580 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.

Find studies

Showing 17,201–17,225 of 17,283 studies scoring 30–49 out of 100 (page 689 of 692) · 30,580 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of the first 500 of these studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

Subjects

Authors

Names as each record prints them; the same person can appear under two spellings.

Institutions

From OpenAlex; 16,054 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Lack of detectable radiation hypersensitivity in lymphoblastoid cells from multiple pedigrees of familial Alzheimer disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders 1993-01-01

Recent reports suggest that cultivated nonneuronal cells from individuals with Alzheimer disease (AD) and other specific hereditary neurodegenerative disorders show hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents such as x-rays and radiomimetic chemicals. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Understanding perspectives and research trends in Down syndrome neuropathogenesis: A bibliometric analysis

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Journal of intellectual disabilities : JOID 2024-11-13

Down syndrome (DS), characterised by compromised brain development and intellectual challenges, often manifests Alzheimer's disease (AD) -like symptoms. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

-1154G/A and -2578C/A polymorphisms of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene in Tunisian Alzheimer patients in relation to beta-amyloid (1-42) and total tau protein

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Neuroscience letters 2010-02-04

Recent evidences indicate that polymorphisms within the promoter region of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene may elevate the risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Supportive CSF biomarker evidence to enhance the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association criteria for diagnosis of Alzheimer's type dementia--a study from Southern India

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Asian journal of psychiatry 2014-11-06

The present study was undertaken to validate the measurement of biomarkers as a supplement to the latest diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer disease (AD) dementia by National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) work group using a sample attending a tertiary care center in Southern India. 4 key findings →

Participants: 12 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

[Patients with mild cognitive impairment and a reduced CSF Aβ₁₋₄₂ protein progress rapidly to Alzheimer's disease]

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Neurologia (Barcelona, Spain) 2011-05-31

Some studies have shown that CSF amyloid-beta 1-42 (Aβ₁₋₄₂), total tau (T-tau) and tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (P-tau(181p)) proteins are useful diagnostic markers for distinguishing between clinically stable mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients and those who will develop Alzheimeŕs disease (AD). 4 key findings →

Participants: 36 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

[Biological markers for Alzheimer disease]

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Seishin shinkeigaku zasshi = Psychiatria et neurologia Japonica 2003-01-01

The development of diagnostic markers for earlier and more reliable diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) is essential, particularly because therapeutic medication is available for AD. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

CHMP2B p.Ala30Ser Variant in Biomarker-Confirmed Early-Onset Alzheimer Disease: A Potential Endolysosomal Disease Modifier

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Alzheimer disease and associated disorders 2026-06-04

Endolysosomal dysfunction has been increasingly implicated in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

The Differential Diagnosis and Treatment of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. The Journal of clinical psychiatry 2022-12-26

Identifying patients at risk for developing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer disease (AD) remains challenging in clinical practice, even as scientific understanding of dementia advances generally. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Calculating cognitive decline in delirium

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Age and Ageing 2014-06-22

The 101 CADIS patients demonstrated several new findings: (i) the mean delay between symptom onset and admission was 1.4 days; (ii) for daily attention tests, 5-digit span forward improved to baseline in a mean of 1.3 days, whereas 6-digit span improved in a mean of 5.7 days; (iii) Delirium index, a 7-question instrument for monitoring delirium [2–3] improved to baseline in a mean of 5.8 days. 1 key finding →

Evidence: high

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

RICHMOND HEALTH AND WELLNESS PROGRAM: COMMUNITY ADVISORY COUNCIL OUTCOMES

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Innovation in Aging 2018-11-01

The Richmond Health and Wellness Program (RHWP) provides interprofessional care coordination and wellness services within Richmond’s low income senior housing communities for approximately 1,000 subsidized housing units. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Meeting the mental health needs of people with the complex neurodevelopment condition, Prader-Willi syndrome: a major challenge for mental health services

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. European Psychiatry 2026-06-01

The behavioural and mental health needs of people with PWS result from the interactions between biological vulnerabilities associated with having PWS and living in a changing and demanding environment. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

The growing link between microbes, mood and mental health

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Knowable Magazine 2024-01-09

Most remarkably, research by Cryan and others has shown that transplanting microbes from the guts of people with psychiatric disorders like depression to the guts of rodents can cause comparable symptoms in the animals.CREDIT: JAMES PROVOST (CC BY-ND)Neuroscientist John CryanUniversity College CorkThese effects may occur in several ways — through the vagus nerve connecting the gut to the brain, through the influence of gut bacteria on our immune systems, or by microbes synthesizing molecules that our nerve cells use to communicate. 5 key findings →

Evidence: high

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Improving Benefits and Integrating Care for Older Medicare Beneficiaries with Physical or Cognitive Impairment

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Issue brief (Commonwealth Fund) 2016-10-01

Medicare Help at Home—a proposal to add supplemental home- and community-based services—could be financed by income-related cost-sharing, beneficiary monthly premiums of $42, and an incremental payroll tax on employers and employees of 0.4 percent. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Integrated care organizations: Medicare financing for care at home

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. The American journal of managed care 2016-11-01

A targeted HCBS benefit could be added to Medicare and financed with income-related cost sharing ranging from 5% to 50%, a premium paid by Medicare beneficiaries of approximately $42 a month, and payroll taxes estimated at around 0.4% of earnings on employers and employees. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Overcoming Patient Access Barriers in Complex Conditions: Lessons from Schizophrenia for Broader Healthcare Applications

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 30 out of 100. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy 2025-12-23

Patient access to innovative care for complex conditions like schizophrenia remains limited by systemic, clinical and policy-level barriers. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (64.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,037 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed    Where this research is being discussed: events