Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

Showing 5,501–5,525 of 27,146 studies marked Peer-reviewed (page 221 of 1086) · 28,180 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Download bibliography of the first 500 of these studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Growing evidence indicates that apolipoprotein E (ApoE) is one of the most important candidate genes for influencing the development of hemodialysis (HD). 3 key findings →

Design: case-control study Participants: 485 Evidence: moderate

N-terminal and mid-region tau fragments as fluid biomarkers in neurological diseases

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100. Brain : a journal of neurology 2022-08-01

After analytical validation, the diagnostic performance of these biomarkers was evaluated in CSF and compared with the Innotest total tau (and as proof of concept, with N-p-tau181 and N-p-tau217) in three clinical cohorts (n = 342 total). 5 key findings →

Participants: 342 Evidence: moderate

Brain degeneration in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) results from the accumulation of pathological amyloid- (Aβ) plaques and tau protein tangles, leading to altered plasma levels of biomarkers. 5 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 40 Evidence: moderate

Phosphorylated tau 231, memory decline and medial temporal atrophy in normal elders

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 59 out of 100. Neurobiology of aging 2010-02-04

Little is known whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) can predict both memory decline and associated longitudinal medial temporal lobe (MTL) gray matter (GM) reductions in cognitively healthy individuals. 2 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 57 Evidence: moderate

Our findings support an association of APOE ɛ4 and p-tau181 with preclinical AD and hippocampus functioning. 4 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Longitudinal OEF change in older adults is primarily related to vascular pathology. 2 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Amyloid, tau, neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation plasma biomarkers are modified in DLB, albeit with moderate diagnosis performance. 2 key findings →

Participants: 104 Evidence: low

Slow paced breathing via heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback stimulates vagus-nerve pathways that counter noradrenergic stress and arousal pathways that can influence production and clearance of Alzheimer's disease (AD)-related proteins. 2 key findings →

Participants: 108 Evidence: high

Unlike previous research that used traditional immunoassay, recent studies that measured plasma Aβ42/40 using fully automated platforms reported promising results. 3 key findings →

Participants: 174 Evidence: moderate

Plasma tau phosphorylated at threonine 181 (p-tau181) and 217 (p-tau217) have demonstrated high accuracy for Alzheimer's disease (AD) diagnosis, defined by CSF/PET amyloid beta (Aβ) positivity, but most studies have been performed in research cohorts, limiting their generalizability. 3 key findings →

Participants: 468 Evidence: moderate

Plasma proteins improved classification accuracy of AD pathology in cognitively-impaired older adults and appeared representative of amyloid pathology. 1 key finding →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 72 Evidence: moderate

Our multimarker blood test interpretation tool is ready for testing in real-world clinical dementia settings. 4 key findings →

Participants: 1,199 Evidence: low

Lumipulse plasma Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 is a scalable assay for detection of cerebral Aβ and prediction of risk for cognitive decline across the AD continuum. 2 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate

Serum Abeta40/42 ratio was significantly higher in MDD patients than in controls, and this difference was seen for both elderly and young subjects. 5 key findings →

Design: cohort study Participants: 60 Evidence: moderate

Levels of plasma Aβ42 and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio were elevated in patients with possible cognitive impairment, indicating that plasma Aβ42 and Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio increases may be more pronounced in early stage of cognitive impairment. 2 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,314 Evidence: low

Exposure to environmental chemicals such as lead (Pb) during vulnerable developmental periods can result in adverse health outcomes later in life. 4 key findings →

Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate

Including apolipoprotein E-ε4 (APOE-ε4) status and older age into consideration may increase the accuracy of plasma Aβ 42 /Aβ 40 detecting Aβ+ individuals, but the rationale behind this remains to be fully understood. 2 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

These data suggest that IL6 trans-signaling and the inheritance of the IL6R Ala 358 variant are related to reduced cognition and greater levels of biomarkers for AD disease pathology. 4 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 120 Evidence: low

We identified a series of transmembrane proteins, proteins associated with or anchored to the plasma membrane, and proteins involved in or connected to synaptic vesicle transport to be associated with CSF biomarkers of amyloid and tau pathology in AD. 4 key findings →

Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate

There are biologically meaningful Aβ-downstream effects in individuals with a low burden of Aβ pathology, while structural and functional changes are still subtle or absent. 5 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate

Different stages of Parkinson's disease (PD) are defined by clinical criteria, while late-stage PD is marked by the onset of morbidity milestones and rapid clinical deterioration. 3 key findings →

Participants: 118 Evidence: low

Using blood samples from the publicly available ADNI research cohort (191 people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia), this study found the PrecivityAD2 blood test agreed with amyloid PET scans about 91% of the time. 3 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 191 Evidence: moderate

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed