You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.
Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline800-272-390024 hours a day, 365 days a yearFree, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline98824/7Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline866-232-84849:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a weekLicensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat.Text: 646-586-5283
In a medical emergency, call 911.
More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.
Research
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Find studies
Showing 2,776–2,800 of 3,821 studies published 2025(page 112 of 153)· 27,380 in the whole library·How the 0–100 score works
Download bibliography of the first 500 of these studies, in this order: BibTeX (.bib) · RIS (.ris)
From OpenAlex; 12,859 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.
A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.
We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.
In a cohort of 75 patients who completed Moneta's program (average age 73 ± 10, average MoCA score 20 ± 5), 59% had MCI and 33% had dementia. 5 key findings →
BackgroundCurrent physical activity literature does not distinguish between young (dementia diagnosed before 65) and late onset dementia despite differences between these groups such as age, being known to influence physical activity levels. 1 key finding →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100.·PRX Life·2025-10-07
The spontaneous self-assembly of proteins and nucleic acids into biomolecular condensates has been shown to ubiquitously contribute to the functional compartmentalization of the cell. 1 key finding →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100.·Viruses·2025-05-19
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been linked to long-term neurological effects with multifaceted complications of neurodegenerative diseases. 2 key findings →
Several reports confirmed possible inadvertent iatrogenic intracranial transmission of Aβ pathology via medical and surgical procedures (1,2).A common molecular mechanism, described in prion diseases, is proposed to trigger the replication and spread of different misfolded proteins in the central nervous system (CNS), causing different neurodegenerative diseases associated with disease-specific proteins such as α-synuclein in Parkinson's disease, and amyloid-beta (Aβ) in Alzheimer's disease, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) (3). 5 key findings →
Cardiac damage and neurodegeneration simultaneously evolve in children and young adults, exposed to environmental oxidative, magnetic, motion capable, ultrafine particulate matter (UFPM) and industrial nanoparticles (NPs). 5 key findings →
Alterations in transactivating response region DNA-binding protein 43 (TDP-43) are prevalent in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), frontotemporal dementia (FTD), and other neurological disorders. 2 key findings →
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is an extremely common pathology of Alzheimer's disease (AD) included under vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID). 1 key finding →
Aβ 42 , TDP-43, and neurogranin show potential as blood-based biomarkers for cognitive decline and may provide insight into the pathogenesis of neurodegeneration. 3 key findings →
Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most prevalent form of dementia, is pathologically defined by amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, synaptic loss, and progressive neuronal degeneration. 2 key findings →
The brain contains approximately 100 billion neurons and over 200 billion glial cells, which are integral to the neuronal networks that support normal brain function in the central nervous system. 5 key findings →
It primarily affects cerebral regions responsible for cognition, memory, and language processing, significantly impeding the functional independence of patients. 1 key finding →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100.·Alcohol·2025-11-07
Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) affect substantial populations worldwide and increase the risk of developing cognitive impairments and alcohol-associated dementia. 2 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100.·ASN NEURO·2025-05-19
Proliferation of microglia represents a physiological process, which is accelerated in several neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer disease (AD). 2 key findings →
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is characterized by the hallmark pathologies of β-amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), which vary across brain regions and between affected individuals. 2 key findings →
Depression in Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia has become an increasingly recognized public health concern due to its high prevalence and substantial impact on patient outcomes. 5 key findings →
Obesity is associated with numerous adverse neural effects, including reduced neurogenesis, cognitive impairment, and increased risks for developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia. 5 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100.·Biomedicines·2025-12-26
Mixed dementia (MD), characterized by overlapping features of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD), represents the most prevalent form of late-life cognitive decline. 5 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100.·Glia·2025-09-01
The C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion mutation is the most common genetic cause of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia, but its cell type-specific effects on energy metabolism and immune pathways remain poorly understood. 3 key findings →
The findings demonstrate that administration of S1P analogs cP1P and P1P at 0.1 mg/kg and 1 mg/kg significantly reduced Aβ burden by inhibiting the amyloidogenic pathway and decreasing hyperphosphorylated tau protein levels in the mouse brain. 5 key findings →
✓ Peer-reviewedalzhub usefulness score 39 out of 100.·Molecular Psychiatry·2025-09-26
Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the second most common cause of dementia in patients under 65 years, characterized by diverse clinical symptoms, neuropathologies, and genetic background. 5 key findings →
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription
label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journal tierup to 10 pts
Journal's citation recordup to 4 pts
Study designup to 12 pts
Strength of evidenceup to 5 pts
Peer-review validationup to 10 pts
How recentup to 5 pts
Sample sizeup to 4 pts
Effect reportedup to 3 pts
Studied in peopleup to 3 pts
Randomised / blindedup to 2 pts
Times citedup to 7 pts
Citations per yearup to 5 pts
Impact for its field and yearup to 6 pts
Cited by studies hereup to 6 pts
Still being citedup to 4 pts
Senior author's track recordup to 4 pts
Institution's track recordup to 3 pts
Multi-centre collaborationup to 3 pts
Indexed in PubMedup to 2 pts
Free to readup to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of
it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC
(60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%),
plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here,
that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the
library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any
journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card
on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a
peer-reviewed article.