27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
We included 730 Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) participants without dementia (282 cognitively normal, 448 mild cognitive impairment) with baseline [ 18 F]florbetapir PET and CSF Aβ 42 available. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 318 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
From 2000 to 2002, we assessed parental history of dementia in participants without dementia of the Rotterdam Study. 4 key findings →
Participants: 2,087 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Starting in 1991, participants were assessed with the Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument (CASI) and diagnosed with dementia (including subtype) based on published criteria. 4 key findings →
Participants: 44 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
4,824 patients seen at the memory clinic between 2008-2018 were included in this study (mean age 72.7 [standard deviation 11.0] years, 2,712 [56%] female, 543 [11%] Black). 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 4,824 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 463 ADNI participants with baseline MCI (mean age 72.6 ± 7.3 years, 43.4% female), the OSA PRS, adjusted for BMI, was significantly associated with MCI-to-AD progression. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 752 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The ARIC study enrolled 15,792 participants (27% Black) aged 45-64 years. 5 key findings →
Participants: 15,792 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of the 2,183 participants (mean ± SD age 79 ± 4.5 years, 58% female, 24% Black), 176 (8%) developed dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,183 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The aim of this study was to investigate whether adherence to conventional dietary recommendations or to a modified Mediterranean diet are associated with a subsequent lower risk of developing all-cause dementia, Alzheimer disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), or with future accumulation of AD-related β-amyloid (Aβ) pathology. 5 key findings →
Participants: 738 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
IL-6, and, to a lesser degree, CRP levels were associated with WMH severity as well as global markers of brain atrophy. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,316 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The results of this preliminary case-control study suggest that estradiol levels may decline significantly in women in whom AD develops. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 50 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Lower RBC DHA levels are associated with smaller brain volumes and a "vascular" pattern of cognitive impairment even in persons free of clinical dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,575 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Thirty full-text articles met the eligibility criteria. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Using the best available data, our survey of a limited number of disorders shows that the burden of neurologic illness affects many millions of people in the United States. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These optimized thresholds can help to inform future research and clinical trials targeting early Aβ. 2 key findings →
Participants: 342 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Performance was assessed in comparison to clinical diagnosis (blinded to plasma results) and amyloid status (CSF/PET). 4 key findings →
Participants: 268 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings suggest an association of sHHV infection with white matter volume loss, attentional decline, and astrogliosis. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 119 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
CSF Aβ 42 and PiB PET showed maximal correlation when collected within 6 years of each other ( R ≈ -0.5). 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 371 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Higher baseline p-tau181 and NfL were associated with significantly faster decline in most cognitive, physical, and functional outcomes (+1 SD p-tau181: β MMSE = -0.055, 95% CI -0.067 to -0.043, β FCSRT = -0.034, 95% CI -0.043 to -0.025, β fluency = -0.029, 95% CI -0.038 to -0.020, β SPPB = -0.040, 95% CI -0.057 to -0.022, and β 4IADL = -0.115, 95% CI 0.091-0.140. +1 SD NfL: β MMSE = -0.039, 95% CI -0.053 to -0.025, β FCSRT = -0.022, 95% CI -0.032 to -0.012, β fluency = -0.014, 95% CI -0.024 to -0.004, and β 4IADL = 0.077, 95% CI 0.048-0.105). 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,938 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The results of this study indicate that the DMN abnormalities observed in patients with AD represent an accelerated aging pattern of connectivity compared with matched controls. 3 key findings →
Participants: 28 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In addition to known candidate genes, APOE, TOMM40, and one hypothetical gene LOC100129500 partially overlapping APOE; one novel gene, EPC2, and several other interesting genes were associated with CSF biomarkers that are related to AD. 3 key findings →
Participants: 374 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Arterial stiffness, measured by PWV, is an emerging risk factor for dementia through its repeated relationships with cognition, cSVD, and Aβ deposition. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A population-based longitudinal study in Sweden, the Kungsholmen Project A random sample of 370 nondemented persons, aged 75 years and older and not treated with B(12) and folate, was followed for 3 years to detect incident AD cases. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Moderate and severe head injuries in young men may be associated with increased risk of AD and other dementias in late life. 4 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Patients with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) with no known diagnosis of ALS or family history of ALS were clinically and electrophysiologically assessed for the presence of ALS. 1 key finding →
Participants: 36 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Incidence of parkinsonism and PD increased with age, PD was the most common type of parkinsonism, and men had a risk of developing PD twice that of women. 2 key findings →
Participants: 4,341 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →