27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
As the first NMA comparing different interventions for AD and MCI, our study suggests that PE and CCT might have a significant improvement in cognition and neuropsychiatric symptoms respectively. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 1,747 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Seventeen RCTs, comprising 7214 participants, investigated the efficacy of the following drugs: Donepezil, Rivastigmine, Galantamine, Memantine, Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb), Atorvastatin-calcium and Vitamin B in the treatment of AD. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 7,214 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
There was no significant difference between the two groups in baseline age, sex, illiteracy, years of education, and scores on the K-MMSE, CDR, SNSB-II, and K-MBI. 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
All drugs improved the cognitive function, with the effect value ranging from -1.23 (95% CI -2.17 to -0.30) for 20 mg memantine to -3.29 (95% CI -4.14 to -2.45) for 32 mg galantamine. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Dementia is among various diseases affecting the elderly, who is also at a high risk for fractures. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 66,797 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Neurodegenerative disease in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was observed. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 8,640 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Choline alfoscerate exhibits additional cognitive improvement in both cognitive and noncognitive domains, supporting the findings of the ASCOMALVA trial. 2 key findings →
Participants: 119 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The protective effect of statin on Alzheimer disease (AD) is still controversial, probably due to the debate about when to start the use of statin and the lack of any large-scale randomized evidence that actually supports the hypothesis. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These estimates suggest that DSS provides clinically important reductions in symptoms of AD and VD and can be a promising anti-dementia drug candidate. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 567 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This is the first study to test community-based family dementia caregiver intervention in Vietnam. 1 key finding →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The AD set included 23,092 cases and 30,920 controls, the ALS set included 7391 cases and 12,442 controls, and the PD set included 8498 patients and 9161 controls. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 23,092 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This pilot trial aims to explore the feasibility of the trial, verify essential information of its efficacy and safety. 5 key findings →
Participants: 25 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
NE3107 was associated with clinician-rated improvements in cerebral blood flow and functional connectivity within the brain. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 17 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In addition, the hematocrit correlated significantly with severity, independent of the longer duration of symptoms in nonanemic patients. 1 key finding →
Participants: 143 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Alzheimer disease (AD) is one of the most common diseases among the older adults. 5 key findings →
Participants: 45 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combined NF-acupuncture therapy, and expect that it will serve as the basis for the use of NF together with acupuncture in the clinical setting. 1 key finding →
Participants: 22 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The results of this review will determine the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine for AD. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study evaluates the efficacy, safety, and economics of galantamine in the treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD) patients, and to provide evidence-based reference for optimizing drug selection, dosing strategies, and reimbursement policies in clinical practice. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study summarizes the existing literature on TSPO expression in specific regions of the brain in patients with dementia, and also provides some preliminary evidence on the possible association between neuroinflammation and dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We performed an observational analysis of prospectively collected data on 1,474 adult patients who were hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia; 1,169 patients were under 80 years of age and 305 (21%) patients were over 80 years ("very elderly"). 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,169 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
People with intellectual disabilities are at a higher risk for experiencing behavioral, emotional, and psychiatric problems in comparison with the general population. 2 key findings →
Participants: 255 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The global population is aging, and as a consequence, the prevalence of dementia is increasing rapidly. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study will provide evidences to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SMYZD in combination with GBEs in treatment of VaD, as well as the adjuvant role of SMYZD in combination. 5 key findings →
Participants: 196 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The results of the inverse variance weighted analysis demonstrate a significant positive causal relationship between stroke and VaD (OR = 2.06, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-3.61, P = .01). 5 key findings →
Participants: 222 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These results are discussed in the light of previously published series and case reports of Whipple disease. 2 key findings →
Participants: 52 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →