27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
A significant drug-placebo difference on the ADAS-Cog12 favoring GV-971 was present at each measurement time point, measurable at the week 4 visit and continuing throughout the trial. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 818 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Smoking cessation was associated with a sustained lower dementia risk and slower cognitive decline, comparable to never smokers and those without short-term risk increase. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 32,802 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
China bears a heavy burden of AD costs, which greatly change the estimates of AD cost worldwide. 2 key findings →
Participants: 3,098 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Recently, several animal studies indicated that the 'gut-brain' axis might contribute to the amyloid deposition of AD. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 97 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 13 592 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.34 [9.39] years; 7175 [52.8%] female), 6525 (48.0%) experienced possible childhood loneliness, and 565 (4.2%) reported childhood loneliness. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 592 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
China has the largest population of patients with dementia in the world, imposing a heavy burden on the public and health care systems. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Intimate metabolic host-microbiome crosstalk regulates immune, metabolic, and neuronal response in health and disease, yet remains untapped for biomarkers or intervention for disease. 2 key findings →
Participants: 77 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sepsis is a leading cause of death in critical illness, and its pathophysiology varies depending on preexisting medical conditions. 4 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Individuals with both physical frailty and depression had the highest risk of dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 947 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
With the advancement of anti-amyloid treatments for Alzheimer disease, accurate assays for amyloid-β (Aβ) pathology are essential. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 431 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
One-third of adults with neurological conditions in China have low health literacy, with pronounced socioeconomic and geographic disparities. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,120 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SICM) is common in septic patients with a high mortality and is characterized by an abnormal immune response. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study aimed to investigate the effects of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell-2 (TREM2) on the production of pro-inflammatory mediators and cytokines induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in BV2 microglia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 389,314 participants, CKM stages were distributed as follows: stage 0 (10.0%), stage 1 (8.0%), stage 2 (57.6%), stage 3 (17.9%), and stage 4 (6.5%). 5 key findings →
Participants: 389,314 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Adipose tissue remodeling plays a significant role in obesity-induced insulin resistance. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
CSF samples were retrospectively collected from 253 subjects recruited at Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, and Beijing Tiantan Hospital between July 2013 and September 2019. 4 key findings →
Participants: 253 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
These models demonstrated high diagnostic efficacy in distinguishing diseased samples from healthy donors as well as distinguishing AD and DLB cases. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dietary supplement silver nanoparticles have recently drawn attention following reports of hazards associated with long-term use. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →