alzhub.org
Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Research

27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.

Find studies

Showing 101–125 of 139 studies with an author at Sorbonne Université (FR) (page 5 of 6) · 27,380 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

Subjects

Authors

Names as each record prints them; the same person can appear under two spellings.

Other institutions

From OpenAlex; 12,859 studies have no institution on record and are not counted here.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Conditional BDNF Delivery from Astrocytes Rescues Memory Deficits, Spine Density, and Synaptic Properties in the 5xFAD Mouse Model of Alzheimer Disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 2019-01-30

It has been well documented that neurotrophins, including brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), are severely affected in Alzheimer's disease (AD), but their administration faces a myriad of technical challenges. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Brain health services for the secondary prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia: Opportunities, challenges, and the business case for existing and future facilities

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease 2025-03-17

A European Task Force has recently developed and published the concept and protocols for the setup of the innovative health offer of Brain Health Services for the secondary prevention of dementia and cognitive impairment (dBHS). dBHS are outpatient health care facilities where adult persons can find an assessment of their risk of developing cognitive impairment and dementia, have their risk level and contributing factors communicated using appropriate language supported by adequate communication tools, can decide to participate to programs for personalized risk reduction if at higher risk, and benefit from cognitive enhancement interventions. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Accuracy of blood-based neurofilament light to different genetic frontotemporal dementia from primary psychiatric disorders

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100. Journal of Alzheimer s Disease 2025-07-02

NfL holds potential as a blood-based biomarker for symptomatic genetic FTD carriers, with moderate accuracy to distinguish PPD from mild forms including C9orf72 . 3 key findings →

Participants: 474 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Human brain connectivity: Clinical applications for clinical neurophysiology

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology 2020-04-21

This manuscript is the second part of a two-part description of the current status of understanding of the network function of the brain in health and disease. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

White matter hyperintensities precede other biomarkers in GRN frontotemporal dementia

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Alzheimer s & Dementia 2025-10-01

Symptomatic GRN carriers showed elevated WMHs, primarily in the frontal lobe, while no significant increase was observed in symptomatic C9orf72 or MAPT carriers. 5 key findings →

Participants: 763 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Prediction of continuous amyloid positron emission tomography with fluid measures of phosphorylated tau and β-amyloid

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 46 out of 100. EMBO Molecular Medicine 2025-12-01

CSF Aβ42/Aβ40 contributed most to identify Aβ-positivity, while continuous Aβ-PET load within the positive range was best predicted by plasma P-tau217. 1 key finding →

Participants: 1,053 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Prognostic Value of A/T/N Biomarkers: Comparing Plasma and Imaging Modalities in Alzheimer Disease

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Clinical nuclear medicine 2025-09-01

Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by amyloid-β plaques (A), tau tangles (T), and neurodegeneration (N), collectively defining the ATN framework. 4 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Cerebellar dysfunction in frontotemporal dementia: intra-cerebellar pathology and cerebellar network degeneration

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 45 out of 100. Journal of Neurology 2025-03-25

Radial diffusivity analyses detected impaired bilateral cerebello-frontal, cerebello-parietal, and cerebello-temporal connectivity in all study groups along the ALS-FTD spectrum. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

The neuroinflammatory biomarker YKL-40 for neurodegenerative diseases: advances in development

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 44 out of 100. Expert review of proteomics 2019-06-14

It is not associated with the presence of the APOE -ε4 allele whereas possibly linked to aging, female sex, Hispanic ethnicity and some genetic variants of the chitinase-3-like 1 locus. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

Structural and functional connectivity in tau mutation carriers: from presymptomatic to symptomatic frontotemporal dementia

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 44 out of 100. Alzheimer s & Dementia 2025-07-01

Early isolated functional disruptions in salience/visual networks were present in asymptomatic carriers, along with anterior cingulate gray matter reductions. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Defining the spectrum of frontotemporal dementias associated with TARDBP mutations

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 43 out of 100. Neurology. Genetics 2016-05-26

We describe the largest series of patients with TARDBP mutations presenting with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and review the cases in the literature to precisely characterize FTD diseases associated with this genotype. 2 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Outcome associations of CSF total tau in suspected non-Alzheimer pathophysiology

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 42 out of 100. Journal of neurology 2026-04-30

Cognitively impaired patients with negative biomarkers of amyloidosis but with neurochemical evidence of Tau pathophysiology or neurodegeneration or both are classified as "suspected non-Alzheimer pathophysiology" (SNAP), according to the 2018 research framework for a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →

Participants: 99 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription

P1‐243: BIOMARKER‐GUIDED STRATIFICATION APPROACH OF THE CLINICAL CONTINUUM OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE USING UNSUPERVISED CLUSTERING METHODS

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Alzheimer s & Dementia 2019-07-01

We found 5 distinct clusters of subjects (N=38, N=16, N=24, N=14, N=21) with a composition statistically independent from that obtained using available clinical diagnostic criteria (each cluster included all phenotypical groups). 3 key findings →

Participants: 20 Evidence: moderate

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Associations of plasma p‐tau231 with serial position recall performance in free‐of‐dementia individuals

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Journal of Neuropsychology 2025-09-23

Cognitive assessment and analysis of plasma biomarkers are lower-cost options for the early assessment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →

Participants: 327 Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Independent and interactive contributions of white matter hyperintensities and Alzheimer’s disease imaging and plasma biomarkers to cognitive decline in older adults without dementia

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 41 out of 100. Alzheimer s Research & Therapy 2026-03-30

Individual biomarkers significantly predict decline across multiple cognitive domains. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Navigating the introduction of anti-amyloid therapy in Europe: a position statement by individual members of the EADC

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Alzheimer s Research & Therapy 2025-05-24

In total, 24 recommendations were developed covering the research landscape and priorities within research in AD following a possible approval, potential impact on health care systems and diagnostic pathways, and communication to patients about anti-amyloid antibodies. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

Behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia as a model for understanding the cognitive and cerebral determinants of verbal creativity

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 40 out of 100. Behavioral and Brain Functions 2025-08-23

We dissociated four key cognitive components underlying remote thinking: spontaneous associative thinking, inhibition of unoriginal responses, intentional remote associative thinking, and verbal initiation; and replicated them in three independent datasets. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed