27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
We describe the first large-scale, potentially label-enabling clinical trial of a preclinical treatment for ADAD. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 300 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) were the most common adverse events reported in the phase 3 ENGAGE and EMERGE trials of aducanumab, an anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 1,691 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the first of five phases in the evolution of beta-amyloidosis Abeta deposits are found exclusively in the neocortex. 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Nilotinib is safe and achieves pharmacologically relevant cerebrospinal fluid concentrations. 4 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 37 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The CAD106 first-in-human study demonstrated a favorable safety profile and promising antibody response. 4 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Participants: 47 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cognitive functioning, mood, and health-related QOL were significantly improved following a 24-week course of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor donepezil. 5 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Participants: 35 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PKs) of bapineuzumab (AAB-001), a humanized monoclonal antibody to amyloid beta, were evaluated in patients with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer disease in a phase 1, randomized, third-party unblinded, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose trial. 2 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Mean (SD) β-glucocerebrosidase levels were higher at week 26 (ambroxol, 12.45 [1.97] nmol/h/mg; 91% CI, 11.54-13.36 nmol/h/mg); placebo, 8.50 [1.96] nmol/h/mg; 91% CI, 7.65-9.34 nmol/h/mg; P = .05) in the ambroxol group compared with placebo. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 75 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Once-weekly 5-mg/d donepezil TDS demonstrated minimal skin irritation under conditions of use of 3 consecutive weekly patch applications to the same skin site and minimal sensitization potential. 2 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 198 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Of the total of 1795 subjects randomized in Clarity AD, 294 subjects were in the Asian region (Japan:152; Korea:129; Singapore:13). 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 294 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our study compared the pain associated with 5- and 15-s subcutaneous injections of gantenerumab and evaluated the tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of subcutaneous gantenerumab. 4 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Collectively, plasma biomarker findings in the low p-tau217 subgroup were more robust than in the mITT population. 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Mean age of completers (n = 30) was 73.5 years and mean Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score was 22.5. 3 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Participants: 30 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
BACE1 is a key protease controlling the formation of amyloid β, a peptide hypothesized to play a significant role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The AD drug development pipeline has agents representing a substantial array of treatment mechanisms and targets. 1 key finding →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 31 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
An (18)F-labeled PET amyloid-beta (Abeta) imaging agent could facilitate the clinical evaluation of late-life cognitive impairment by providing an objective measure for Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology. 4 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Participants: 16 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
NE3107 was associated with clinician-rated improvements in cerebral blood flow and functional connectivity within the brain. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 17 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A substantial difference in the type of therapeutics researched was observed, with anti-amyloid and anti-tau RCTs being more likely to be funded by the pharmaceutical industry compared with neurotransmitter or other RCTs (anti-amyloid or anti-tau, 68 of 71 [95.8%]; neurotransmitter, 52 of 69 [77.6%]; other, 33 of 52 [63.5%]). 2 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 203 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
ATTRACTnet was developed in an internal test set of 799 patients (mean [SD] age, 75.1 [11.1] years; 516 [64.7%] male and 283 [35.3%] female) using 5-fold cross-validation with an additional external test set of 422 patients. 5 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Participants: 799 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Here we describe results of a Phase 2a study of a promising new drug candidate that significantly reversed all measured biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease, neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. 5 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Participants: 13 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cellular senescence contributes to Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis. 1 key finding →
Design: open-label trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Upon further refinement and validation, the VWD model could inform strategies for dosing and ARIA monitoring in individuals with an ARIA-E history. 1 key finding →
Design: open-label trial Participants: 112 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Compared to the 2023 pipeline, there are fewer trials (164 vs. 187), fewer drugs (127 vs. 141), fewer new chemical entities (88 vs. 101), and a similar number of repurposed agents (39 vs. 40). 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 56 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Crenezumab is a humanized anti-abeta monoclonal antibody in development for the treatment of Alzheimer disease (AD). 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 433 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
SCarlet RoAD (NCT01224106; WN25203), a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-year study of gantenerumab in prodromal AD, was the first global registration-enabling study using biomarker screening for entry and a single clinical endpoint for outcome. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 312 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →