Video use remains low in primary care telehealth consultations. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
32,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Home-visit nursing can reduce early readmissions and improve quality of life in older patients with heart failure (HF). 5 key findings →
Participants: 88 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Enrollment in an MA plan is associated with a higher probability of AWV uptake, particularly among vulnerable populations from racial and ethnic minorities, dual eligibility, and those diagnosed with ADRD. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
30/100
Our study underscores the role of telehealth in increasing AWV uptake and facilitating cognitive assessments. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Patient access to innovative care for complex conditions like schizophrenia remains limited by systemic, clinical and policy-level barriers. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
MA-PD enrollees had significantly lower utilization of PIMs than standalone PDP enrollees: a 0.7 percentage-point [95% CI: 0.5, 0.8] lower prevalence of potentially harmful drug-disease interactions in older adults with dementia; a 3.1 percentage-point [2.6, 3.5] lower prevalence of potentially harmful drug-disease interactions in older adults with dementia and a history of falls; and a 0.5 percentage-point [0.4, 0.6] lower prevalence of high-risk medications in older adults. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
As states work to maximize limited resources while improving population outcomes, the strategic alignment of planning processes represents a significant opportunity. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The National Dementia Care Collaborative (NDCC) aims to improve access to and successful implementation of evidence-based comprehensive dementia care. 5 key findings →
Participants: 51 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In the context of an aging population, China’s elderly care market is experiencing a period of significant transformation. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Recent studies indicate that having a billed AWV is associated with increases in preventive care services such as vaccinations, cancer screening, and dementia diagnosis. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
27/100
Puerto Rico is experiencing a rapidly aging population due to outmigration and other demographic changes. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The components of the MIND diet should be evaluated in relation to the dietary habits and cultural background of the population being studied. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In Japan, dementia-related medical services are covered by the universal health insurance system, with patient co-payments based on age and income. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The Ukiyo Project is a collaborative initiative between the Faculty of Fine Arts at the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM) and the Faculty of Psychology at the University of Guanajuato (Mexico), aimed at promoting emotional well-being and mental health in the university environment through art. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
25/100
This study examined how the COVID-19 pandemic altered the sociologic, individual, and biologic personhood of residents living with dementia in nursing homes, guided by Buron’s (2008) Personhood Model for Dementia Care (PMDC). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomized / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multicenter collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 32,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 32,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (66.5% of the library) and OpenAlex (15.8%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,045 records (3.2% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 966 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events
Last updated