27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Patients who meet the criteria for MCI can be differentiated from healthy control subjects and those with very mild AD. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 106 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
These data suggest the following: (1) patients with mild cognitive impairment can be clinically defined, (2) many members of this group progress to Alzheimer's disease, and (3) APOE epsilon 4 allele status appears to be a strong predictor of clinical progression. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 66 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted after adjusting for age, sex, and educational status. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,969 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Behavioral prevention strategies can help maintain high levels of cognition and functional integrity, and can reduce the social, medical, and economic burden associated with cognitive aging and age-associated neurodegenerative diseases. 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Based on informant report, disturbed arousal and disorganized speech are specific aspects of fluctuations in dementia with Lewy bodies that reliably distinguish dementia with Lewy bodies from Alzheimer's disease and normal aging. 4 key findings →
Participants: 200 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Older patients with a college education who present with complaints of cognitive decline (reported by themselves or others) and score less than 27 on the MMSE are at a greater risk of being diagnosed with dementia and should be referred for a comprehensive dementia evaluation, including formal neuropsychological testing. 2 key findings →
Participants: 307 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Individuals with an isolated pathologic diagnosis of AD, hippocampal sclerosis, frontotemporal degeneration, and neurofibrillary tangle--only degeneration usually had substantial hippocampal atrophy, while those with changes of typical aging did not. 2 key findings →
Participants: 67 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based volumetric measurements of medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures can discriminate between normal elderly control subjects and patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) of moderate to advanced severity. 1 key finding →
Participants: 94 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
During follow-up, 13 healthy patients converted to MCI or Alzheimer disease (AD), whereas 39 MCI subjects converted to AD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 72 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The plasma Abeta42/Abeta40 ratio may be a useful premorbid biomarker for identifying cognitively normal elderly white subjects who are at increased risk for developing MCI or AD. 5 key findings →
Participants: 53 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In a clinical sample, patients with nonamnestic MCI were more likely to develop DLB, and those with amnestic MCI were more likely to develop probable AD. 1 key finding →
Participants: 337 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A statistically significant yearly decline in hippocampal volume and an increase in temporal horn volume was identified in elderly control subjects who represent typical aging individuals. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 24 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Despite general agreement about the boundaries of Alzheimer disease (AD), establishing a maximum limit for Alzheimer-type pathology in cognitively intact individuals might aid in defining more precisely the point at which Alzheimer pathology becomes clinically relevant. 1 key finding →
Participants: 19 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
These findings suggest that the initial 1H MRS change in the pathologic progression of AD is an increase in MI/Cr. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 21 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These data suggest that among aged subjects with cognitive impairment and/or parkinsonism, the MSQ has adequate SN and SP for the diagnosis of RBD. 2 key findings →
Participants: 176 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is the most widely used brief screening measure of cognition, but it is not sensitive in detecting mild memory or other cognitive impairments. 4 key findings →
Participants: 788 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The authors assessed whether measures of hippocampal water diffusivity at baseline can predict future progression to Alzheimer disease (AD) in amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Hippocampal ADC was significantly different between control subjects and MCI patients, many of whom likely have preclinical Alzheimer disease. 2 key findings →
Participants: 21 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The efficacy of the MMSE for screening was measured in a subsample of age- and sex-matched patients with dementia (N = 185) and control subjects (N = 227). 4 key findings →
Participants: 185 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In recent years, patients who are at high risk for developing Alzheimer's disease (AD) have become a focus of study. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Despite the theoretical rationale for the superiority of entorhinal measurements in early AD, the authors found MRI measurements of the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex were approximately equivalent at intergroup discrimination. 2 key findings →
Participants: 30 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A variety of anatomic and functional neuroimaging findings are associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Participants: 62 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) has three common alleles (epsilon 2, epsilon 3, and epsilon 4) that determine six genotypes in the general population. 3 key findings →
Participants: 77 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
All people want to age "successfully," maintaining functional capacity and quality of life as they reach advanced age. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →