Overall, 156 (12.5%) women reported taking oestrogen after onset of menopause. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,124 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
30,980 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The association of depression with prevalent MCI and with progression from MCI to dementia, but not with incident MCI, suggests that depression accompanies cognitive impairment but does not precede it. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 2,160 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Diabetes is related to a higher risk of amnestic MCI in a population with a high prevalence of this disorder. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,772 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
69/100
Hypertension after age 65 years is not associated with AD and does not adversely affect memory, language, or general cognitive function. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,259 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
When proper normative values are used, only age and education, and not race or ethnicity, are associated with higher frequency of MCI. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Immunization against amyloid-beta has been suggested as a possible preventive or therapeutic treatment for Alzheimer's disease. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 365 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
OHL was associated with greater risk of incident dementia in a multiethnic cohort. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,881 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
High homocysteine levels were not associated with AD and were not related to a decrease in memory scores over time. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 679 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A history of hypertension is related to a higher risk of MCI. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 918 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
62/100
In the 852 subjects without dementia, depressed mood was more common in individuals with greater cognitive impairment. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,070 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
61/100
The TICS has high diagnostic validity for identification of dementia among ethnically diverse older adults, especially when supported by the DQ and prior visit data. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 256 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Consumption of up to three servings of wine daily is associated with a lower risk of AD in elderly individuals without the APOE epsilon-4 allele. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 260 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Stroke is associated with AD among elderly individuals. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Elevations in plasma Abeta(42) peptide levels are associated with earlier onset of AD and increased risk of death. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 204 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
58/100
Research on the relation between diabetes mellitus and dementia has produced conflicting results, and the relation has not been investigated among Blacks and Hispanics. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This risk score could be used to identify persons at risk of LOAD, but can also be used to adjust for confounders in epidemiologic studies. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
High HDL-C levels in elderly individuals may be associated with a decreased risk of AD. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We found a weak relation between non-HDL-C, LDL-C, and HDL-C levels and the risk of VaD. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,980 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.4%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,042 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 967 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events