Wakefulness, along with fast cortical rhythms and associated cognition, depend on the basal forebrain (BF). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
28,980 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Wakefulness, along with fast cortical rhythms and associated cognition, depend on the basal forebrain (BF). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Accumulation of mononuclear phagocytes [monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells (DCs)] in the vessel wall is a hallmark of atherosclerosis. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This is the first study to assess cerebral microinfarcts (CMIs) on 3 tesla (3T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a memory clinic population. 4 key findings →
Participants: 238 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We included 88 patients with dementia due to AD from the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort. 4 key findings →
Participants: 88 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
On long-term follow-up (median 15 years; minimum-maximum, 0-20), participants developed cardiometabolic disease (hypertension [1255 events]; diabetes [381 events]), chronic kidney disease (529 events), dementia (235 events), cardiovascular disease (684 events) a 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Given the recent acknowledgement of the complex mixed pathologies that contribute to the clinical expression of dementia, various cohort studies have aimed to examine Alzheimer's disease and cerebrovascular disease as comorbid pathologies, with neuroimaging playing a central role in these studies. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy is a common cause of spontaneous lobar hemorrhage in elderly patients. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) encompasses vascular dementia and is the second most common cause of dementing illness after Alzheimer's disease. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
New hippocampal neurons are continuously generated in the adult brain. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
= 0.008). Deficits in medial temporal CVR are observed in older adults with MCI and are related to worse memory function. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In total, 156 individuals were assessed for eligibility, and 79 (51%) were recruited (mean age 61.6 ± 6.9 (range 60-75) years; 68% male). 5 key findings →
Participants: 156 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 2935 patients (50.4% women; mean age=72.2 years; 19.8% subjective cognitive impairment, 39.8% mild cognitive impairment, and 40.4% dementia), larger WMH volume within projection fibres (B=0.24, SE=0.10, p=0.013) was associated with greater apathy. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,935 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) is a leading cause of stroke and dementia with no specific treatment, of which molecular mechanisms remain poorly understood. 2 key findings →
Participants: 40,000 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Diabetes was not associated with brain atrophy cross-sectionally or longitudinally. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 112 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Our aim is to examine the interplay between cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) pathology, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) related amyloid-β (Aβ) clearance, and cognition in general population. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 1,026 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study included 3540 participants with RVC data and 489 with WMH data (median [IQR] age: 73.2 [71.4-76.3] and 72.5 [71.2-75.4] years; female: 52.9% and 47.6%) over a median follow-up of 7.4 [IQR 5.5-8.5] and 3.8 [IQR 2.9-5.3] years, respectively. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 3,540 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Reported rates of dementia differ by race, although most studies have not focused on carefully measured outcomes, confounding by education or other demographic factors, nor have they studied other outcomes other than dementia. 1 key finding →
Participants: 15,792 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Immobility-related complications are very common in the first year after a severely disabling stroke. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The cognitive deficits in VaD and VCI are characterized by disturbance of frontal functions, with less verbal memory impairment. 2 key findings →
Participants: 170 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our results suggest that genes associated with clinical neurological disease also have detectable effects on subclinical phenotypes. 5 key findings →
Participants: 705 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These cross-sectional results suggest that cortical changes (regional-specific damage and network breakdown), mediated (in)directly by WMH (tract-specific damage) and other factors (eg, vascular risk factors), might lead to cognitive decline. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 426 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Log-rank testing, adjusted for matching, showed a highly significant difference in stroke-free survival between the two groups (p<0.0001). 4 key findings →
Participants: 4,709 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Our data suggest that vascular abnormalities, independently of blood pressure levels, may play a role in the setting of subjective memory complaints as well as of WMH in elderly hypertensive patients. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The results underscore the importance of reducing the number of cardiovascular risk factors for maintaining CBF and cognition in an aging population. 5 key findings →
Participants: 69 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 91 nondemented subjects completing neuropsychological testing (mean/SD age, 73.4/11.6 years; 44% female; 56% stroke), 39 (42%) had MCI (amnestic multiple domain=10, nonamnestic multiple domain=9, nonamnestic single domain=19, amnestic single domain=1). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
10 of the 911 studies in this tag that have a study page, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,980 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (62.8% of the library) and OpenAlex (17.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,038 records (3.6% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 966 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →