Cognitive resilience is an important modulating factor of cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease, but the functional brain mechanisms that support cognitive resilience remain elusive. 4 key findings →
Participants: 108
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder characterized by cognitive and intellectual deficits and behavior disturbance. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The two main findings of this paper are (i) the posterior default mode network fails before measurable amyloid plaques and appears to initiate a connectivity cascade that continues throughout the disease spectrum; and (ii) high connectivity between the posterior default mode network and hubs of high connectivity (many located in the frontal lobe) is associated with amyloid accumulation. 2 key findings →
Participants: 128
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Group comparisons revealed significantly decreased within-network connectivity in salience-ventral attention, cognitive control, and default mode network in participants with postoperative delirium (n=31) compared with non-delirious participants (n=89; non-parametric permutation test, 1000 iterations, P<0.05). 5 key findings →
Participants: 31
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Compared to APOE ε4 non-carriers, APOE ε4 carriers had lower rsFC in temporal DMN, but only in non-Hispanic Whites. 3 key findings →
Participants: 166
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Rs-fMRI analysis revealed significant associations between FC and MedDietScore. 5 key findings →
Participants: 105
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Both DELPHI analysis of network function and DTI analysis detected a significant decrease in connectivity, excitability, and WM integrity in the SCD group compared to healthy control (HC) subjects; a significant decrease was also noted for aMCI and Dementia groups compared to HC. 3 key findings →
Participants: 17
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Discrimination of disease-related interactions of the core subsystem and FPN was found in AD-spectrum patients, which was the neural circuit fundamental to plasma NFL disrupting cognitive integrity. 3 key findings →
Participants: 112
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Multimodal biomarkers may identify former contact sports athletes with repeated concussions and at risk for dementia. 3 key findings →
Participants: 16
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
50/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 50 out of 100.
·
GeroScience
·
2023-09-25
Alzheimer's disease (AD), affecting nearly 6.5 million people, is the fifth leading cause of death in individuals 65 years or older in the USA. 4 key findings →
Participants: 32
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Individuals with AD were clustered into 4 subtypes reproducibly, which included those with 1) diffuse and mild functional connectivity disruption (subtype 1), 2) predominantly decreased connectivity in the default mode network accompanied by an increase in the prefrontal circuit (subtype 2), 3) predominantly decreased connectivity in the anterior cingulate cortex accompanied by an increase in prefrontal cortex connectivity (subtype 3), and 4) predominantly decreased connectivity in the basal ganglia accompanied by an increase in prefrontal cortex connectivity (subtype 4). 3 key findings →
Participants: 809
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
In Alzheimer's disease, tau pathology spreads hierarchically from the inferior temporal lobe throughout the cortex, ensuing cognitive decline and dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 55
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Second, to investigate if regions of high tau burden are associated with functional connectivity networks, we extracted the region with the maximum z-value in each of the generated tau pathology networks and used them as seeds in a subsequent resting-state functional MRI analysis, conducted in a group of healthy adults (n = 26) who were part of the 1000 Functional Connectomes Project. 4 key findings →
Participants: 26
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Alzheimer's disease is increasingly considered a large-scale network disconnection syndrome, associated with progressive aggregation of pathological proteins, cortical atrophy, and functional disconnections between brain regions. 4 key findings →
Participants: 49
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
When comparing SCD (N = 40) with NC (N = 45), mdALFFmean decreased at right inferior parietal lobule (IPL) of the frontoparietal network (FPN). 5 key findings →
Participants: 40
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The FC between the retrosplenial (RSC) and parahippocampal cortices (PHC) was the earliest affected FC, while a manifest SC change in the ventral cingulum and fornix was observed in the later ADD stage. 4 key findings →
Participants: 15
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Subcortical vascular mild cognitive impairment (svMCI) is a common prodromal stage of vascular dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 30
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
The disruption of functional connectivity is one of the early events that occurs in the brains of Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients. 2 key findings →
Participants: 32
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Previous work indicates that resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is sensitive to functional brain changes related to Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology across the clinical spectrum. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
According to the network model of neurodegeneration, the spread of pathogenic proteins occurs selectively along connected brain regions. 2 key findings →
Participants: 63
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Neuropathological studies have shown that the typical neurofibrillary pathology of hyperphosphorylated tau protein in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) preferentially affects specific brain regions whereas others remain relatively spared. 5 key findings →
Participants: 44
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
This study demonstrates a disruption of whole-brain topological organization of the functional connectome in aMCI. 3 key findings →
Participants: 37
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
47/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.
·
BMC neuroscience
·
2009-08-21
With decreasing local and global connectivity parameters, the large-scale functional brain network organization in AD deviates from the optimal 'small-world' network structure towards a more 'random' type. 5 key findings →
Participants: 20
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
47/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.
·
Brain
·
2023-05-31
Recent advancements in computational approaches and neuroimaging techniques have refined our understanding of the precuneus. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
47/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 47 out of 100.
·
Brain
·
2015-07-23
These same brain areas were then assessed in a cohort of patients with Alzheimer’s disease versus a healthy older reference group, using a region of interest approach combined with standard structural (MRI), metabolic (fluorodeoxyglucose-PET) and amyloid ligand (florbetapir-PET) neuroimaging. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.