Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

Showing 151–171 of 171 studies (page 7 of 7) · 27,380 in the whole library · How the 0–100 score works

Showing 171 studies tagged diffusion — clear

Browse by subject, author or institution

Each number is how many studies that link shows, with your other filters kept.

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Regional choroid plexus calcifications and their associations with aging, brain structure, and disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-09-16

The choroid plexus (CP) maintains brain homeostasis through cerebrospinal fluid production and formation of the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier, and its dysfunction has been linked with aging and neurological disease. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Performance at digital testing in Alzheimer’s Disease is predicted by selective disruption of microstructural integrity

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-02-12

White matter microstructural abnormalities are increasingly found to be associated with cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s Disease (AD). 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Turbulent dynamics and in silico perturbation-based measures are disrupted across biological stages of Alzheimers disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-13

According to the AT(N) framework, Alzheimers disease (AD) can be biologically characterised by amyloid deposition, tau pathology, and neurodegeneration, yet how these processes relate to whole-brain dynamics remains unclear. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Comparing Harmonization Approaches for Protocol-Related Variability in Multisite Diffusion MRI Data

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-07-11

Diffusion MRI (dMRI) enables assessment of white matter microstructural abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease (AD), and multisite datasets enable more robust modeling of non-biological variation that can confound analyses. 1 key finding →

Evidence: low

Regional Cerebrospinal Fluid Motility as a Key Determinant of Soluble Amyloid-β Levels and Kinetics

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-08-03

Alzheimer’s disease and cerebral amyloid angiopathy are characterized by the accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ) species, yet the human fluid-physiological mechanisms that regulate soluble Aβ transport and clearance remain poorly understood. 3 key findings →

Participants: 502 Evidence: moderate

Residualized WMH T1w/T2w-FLAIR ratio captures lesion-specific microstructural variation missed by volumetric measures, consistent with vascular-gliotic injury in VD and coexisting amyloid-linked demyelination in AD. 4 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 71 Evidence: moderate

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) are highly prevalent in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), conceptualized as an intermediate clinical state between normal aging and dementia. 4 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

In the primary visual cortex (V1), we show that cortical magnification (M) is a deterministic Riemannian coordinate transformation (M \propto 1/\sqrt{\det g}) that equalizes information pressure between the spherical retina and planar cortex.2. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

DESI is a robust, fully automated MRI biomarker that sensitively detects CSF redistribution characteristic of DESH in iNPH. 1 key finding →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,032 Evidence: moderate

In this bvFTD cohort, structural volumes of key frontotemporal and perisylvian regions did not predict behavioral or language impairments after correction for multiple comparisons. 3 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 87 Evidence: moderate

Upper cervical spinal cord morphometric charts: from population references to individualized clinical assessment

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-12

The upper cervical spinal cord is essential for motor, sensory and autonomic function, yet its normative morphometric trajectories and disease-related deviations remain unclear. 2 key findings →

Participants: 2,394 Evidence: low

Contribution of cerebrovascular lesions to neurodegeneration and cognitive decline

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-06

Vascular risk factors were associated with CSVD burden and progression, and WMH and PVS progression were further associated with cortical atrophy and cognitive decline, underscoring the interconnected contributions of vascular risk, CSVD, and neurodegeneration to cognitive aging and dementia risk. 5 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Participants: 289 Evidence: moderate

Pain is independently associated with agitation and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease: a cross-sectional MRI study

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-09-15

Significant positive correlations were observed among pain, cognitive impairment, agitation, and neuropsychiatric symptoms (all p < 0.001). 4 key findings →

Participants: 107 Evidence: low

Selective vulnerability of human basal forebrain subsystems in ageing and neuropsychiatric disorders

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2026-10-15

These findings identify an anatomically specific age-related profile of the human BF, with structural vulnerability manifest and pre-diagnostic neurological disorders, which is not substantially explained by common inherited risk. 2 key findings →

Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate

A Pipeline for ADNI Resting-State Functional MRI Processing and Quality Control

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-10-06

The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) provides a comprehensive multimodal neuroimaging resource for studying aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

A biphasic astrocytic PTGDS trajectory marks a metabolic vulnerability stage in prodromal Alzheimer’s disease

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Research Square 2026-08-27

PTGDS followed a biphasic astrocytic trajectory with a statistically resolved donor-level inflection (quadratic term −2.27, p = 0.006; vertex at pseudo-progression score 0.47, bootstrap 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 0.53). 5 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate

Calibration-Aware and Interpretable Graph Learning for Multi-Cohort Diffusion Connectome Brain-Age Modeling

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-24

Age-bias-corrected brain-age gap was most consistently associated with reduced diffusion-derived microstructural integrity and structural-network organization across cohorts. 2 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,093 Evidence: moderate

Sex-divergent trajectories of hippocampal and cortical NMDA receptor density across the Alzheimer’s disease continuum

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. bioRxiv 2026-08-07

While loss of NMDA receptors (NMDARs) is associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) severity, the effect of sex or the relationship between regional NMDAR density and antemortem cognitive status across the AD spectrum has not been examined. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

From across this tag

10 of the 171 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed