The mean (SD) age of participants was 70.57 (8.00) years, with 179 (42.9 %) females. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 123 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The mean (SD) age of participants was 70.57 (8.00) years, with 179 (42.9 %) females. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 123 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma biomarkers are promising tools for the screening and diagnosis of dementia in clinical settings. 1 key finding →
Participants: 108 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A higher DMV score was significantly associated with increased likelihoods of MCI (OR=1.19; 95%CI=1.06‒1.34) and amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) (1.21; 1.06‒1.37), and lower scores in MMSE (-0.01; -0.02‒0.00; p = 0.041), global cognition (-0.05; -0.08‒-0.03), memory (-0.06; -0.10‒-0.02), verbal fluency (-0.05; -0.08‒-0.02), attention (-0.04; -0.07‒-0.01), and executive function (-0.06; -0.10‒-0.03). 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 903 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
During follow-up 20 SCD and 99 MCI patients developed dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 184 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Serum beta-synuclein level was progressively increased in the AD continuum across the preclinical, MCI and dementia stages compared with controls and was correlated with serum pTau181 (r=0.710), NfL (r=0.494) and GFAP concentrations (r=0.621, p<0.001 for all). 5 key findings →
Participants: 56 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Higher glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) was associated with higher depressive symptoms. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The purpose of the present study was to investigate if cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of neurodegeneration are associated with cognition in bipolar disorder and healthy controls, respectively. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer disease (AD) is a leading cause of dementia that has gained prominence in our aging society. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings suggest that NfL can be used to monitor cognitive decline in aging and Alzheimer's disease and that an attentional control composite may be a better outcome for tracking general neurodegenerative effects on cognition. 3 key findings →
Participants: 255 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The average age at LP was 79.3 years (SD = 5.6), and the average age at death was 87.1 years (SD = 6.5). 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Amyloid-beta (Aβ) 42/40 ratio, tau phosphorylated at threonine-181 (p-tau), and total-tau (t-tau) are considered core biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We developed a biochemical/bioinformatics pipeline to optimize the handling of complex interactions between variables in validating biochemical markers of disease. 1 key finding →
Participants: 230 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This article discusses why CSF biomarkers found in normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) can be misleading when distinguishing NPH from comorbid NPH with Alzheimer disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The antemortem diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) requires time-consuming and costly procedures. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Cerebrospinal fluid values of total tau (T-tau) and β-amyloid 1-42 (Aβ 1-42) obtained using the Innotest enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were transformed using a linear regression model to equivalent values obtained using the INNO-BIA AlzBio3 (xMAP; Luminex) assay. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Physical exercise may have some effect on cognition in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Participants: 53 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Biomarker validation in a clinical cohort. 4 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The National Institute on Aging and Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) have proposed a new Research Framework: Towards a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease, which uses a three-biomarker construct: Aß-amyloid, tau and neurodegeneration AT(N), to generate a biomarker based definition of Alzheimer's disease. 4 key findings →
Participants: 27 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) may have overlapping clinical presentations despite distinct underlying neuropathologies, thus making in vivo diagnosis challenging. 4 key findings →
Participants: 185 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Recent technical advances in peripheral blood analysis have enabled precise quantification of Alzheimer´s Disease (AD) biomarkers in the early stages of the AD continuum, in an economical, non-invasive and safe manner. 4 key findings →
Participants: 329 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
BackgroundC1q is a promoter of the classical pathway of complement and its massive expression may be associated with the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 2 key findings →
Participants: 1,264 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer disease (AD) is characterized by amyloid-β plaques (A), tau tangles (T), and neurodegeneration (N), collectively defining the ATN framework. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Postmortem demonstration of increased expression of biologically active S100B in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and its relation to progression of neuropathological changes across the cortical regions suggests involvement of this astrocytic cytokine in the pathophysiology of AD. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Showa University Karasuyama Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. 4 key findings →
Participants: 106 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Clinical trials of disease modifying drugs for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) might benefit from enrichment with true AD cases. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
10 of the 829 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →