Twenty-six percent of participants were PET positive. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Brain amyloid deposition is one of the main hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and two approaches are available for assessing amyloid pathology in vivo: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers levels and amyloid load visualized by amyloid beta positron emission tomography imaging (Amy-PET) probes. 1 key finding →
Participants: 31 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
APOEε4 is the most well-established genetic risk factor for sporadic Alzheimer's disease and is associated with cerebral amyloid-β. 4 key findings →
Participants: 211 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Strong concordance between CSF biomarkers and Aβ-PET status was observed overall, including for cognitively normal participants, further strengthening the association between these markers of AD neuropathological burden for both developmental research studies and for use in clinical trials. 2 key findings →
Participants: 202 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
CSF Aβ42/40 ratio can predict PET amyloid positivity with high accuracy in patients with a range of cognitive disorders when evaluating Aβ pathology independent of tau and neurodegeneration for research purposes. 4 key findings →
Participants: 44 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A growing body of evidence suggests that the dysregulation of neuronal iron may play a critical role in Alzheimer's disease. 3 key findings →
Participants: 236 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In the cognitively unimpaired group, only higher baseline amyloid PET was a significant independent predictor of higher tau accumulation rates (P < 0.001). 5 key findings →
Participants: 203 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
53/100
This review provides a comprehensive state-of-the-art conceptual review of radiological features, clinical detection and classification challenges, pathophysiology, underlying biological mechanism(s) and risk factors/predictors associated with ARIA. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
[(18)F]flutemetamol amyloid PET detects primarily advanced stages of Aβ pathology in preclinical and symptomatic AD cases. 1 key finding →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 68 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
All amyloid negative subjects imaged were tau-negative. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
52/100
All CSF p-tau biomarkers were accurate predictors of cognitive impairment but CSF p-tau217 demonstrated the largest fold-changes in AD patients in comparison to non-AD dementias and cognitively unimpaired individuals. 3 key findings →
Participants: 171 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Plasma TP42/40 ratio showed a relevant and significant potential as a screening tool to identify brain Aβ positivity in preclinical and prodromal stages of Alzheimer's disease. 3 key findings →
Participants: 39 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
52/100
More specifically, 18F-AV-1451 binding was significantly increased in patients with Alzheimer's disease, relative to patients with progressive supranuclear palsy and with control subjects, in the hippocampus and in occipital, parietal, temporal, and frontal cortices (t's > 2.2, P's < 0.04). 4 key findings →
Participants: 15 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Tau vulnerability in women is not just limited to the medial temporal lobe and significantly contributed to greater risk of faster cognitive decline. 2 key findings →
Participants: 55 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
52/100
Age-related hippocampal sclerosis may account for a significant proportion of elderly participants with amnestic dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 15 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Altered iron metabolism has been hypothesized to be associated with Alzheimer's disease pathology, and prior work has shown associations between iron load and beta amyloid plaques. 5 key findings →
Participants: 421 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Major imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease include amyloid deposition [imaged with [(11)C]Pittsburgh compound B (PiB) PET], altered glucose metabolism (imaged with [(18)F]fluro-deoxyglucose PET), and structural atrophy (imaged by MRI). 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A decrease of self-confidence about memory abilities in cognitively normal elderly subjects may be related to the neuropathological hallmark of AD measured with PiB-positron emission tomography. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
PiB and FDG showed similar accuracy in discriminating AD and FTLD. 2 key findings →
Participants: 62 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We provide the first evidence for the capability of a high-resolution positron emission tomographic (PET) imaging system in quantitatively mapping amyloid accumulation in living amyloid precursor protein transgenic (Tg) mice. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
CRM-adjusted Aβ42 calibrator concentrations were calculated using the regression equation Y (CRM-adjusted) = 0.89X (calibrators) + 32.6. 5 key findings →
Participants: 766 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) of HTS positivity (HTSpos) were the highest (amyloid PET: 0.930 and 0.870, tau PET: 0.944 and 0.957, respectively), while Cimp and Nimp had a high negative predictive value (NPV) for amyloid PET (negativity) (0.750 and 0.725). 5 key findings →
Participants: 155 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Different pipelines gave highly inter-correlated standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) (rho = 0.93-0.99). 5 key findings →
Participants: 23 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In HC and MCI subjects, FBP PET anterior and posterior cingulate and composite standard uptake value ratios correlated with CSF amyloid beta (Aβ1-42) and tau/Aβ1-42 ratios. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
52/100
[18F]Flortaucipir BPND images showed overall highest binding in the symptomatic carriers. 5 key findings →
Participants: 52 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
From across this tag
9 of the 319 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 9. The same 9 appear here every time.
- Comparison of amyloid PET acquired through standardized and unstandardized protocols
- Amyloid pathology fingerprint differentiates post-traumatic stress disorder and traumatic brain injury
- Amyloid PET Imaging in Self-Identified Non-Hispanic Black Participants of the Anti-Amyloid in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's Disease (A4) Study
- Chinese Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Study (C-PAS): Design and Challenge from PET Acceptance
- SPARE-Tau: A flortaucipir machine-learning derived early predictor of cognitive decline
- Defining patient-centered amyloid PET thresholds for the onset of tauopathy in Alzheimer's disease
- Heterogeneity of Tau Deposition and Microvascular Involvement in MCI and AD
- Florbetapir-PET to diagnose cerebral amyloid angiopathy: A prospective study
- The value of subtraction MRI in detection of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with oedema or effusion in Alzheimer's patients: An interobserver study
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →