27,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The double-cutoff approach revealed high confidence for interpreting scans as negative when Centiloid values were lower than 11 (95% CI, 9-13; I2 = 95%) and interpreting scans as positive if Centiloid values were higher than 26 (95% CI, 24-28; I2 = 95%). 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 49,227 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A significant drug-placebo difference on the ADAS-Cog12 favoring GV-971 was present at each measurement time point, measurable at the week 4 visit and continuing throughout the trial. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 818 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Low SES substantially increased the risk of dementia and cognitive dysfunction, suggesting that public health strategies could reduce the dementia burden by reducing social inequalities. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 1,485,702 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma p-tau217/Aβ42 has high performance in detecting cerebral AD pathologies, thus offering a promising tool for clinical diagnosis and community screening of AD. 1 key finding →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 512 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Glymphatic failure may precede amyloid pathology, and predicts amyloid deposition, neurodegeneration, and clinical progression in AD. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 419 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our prediction model was internally evaluated based on five-fold cross-validation on discrimination and calibration, and it was further compared with existing prediction scales. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 2,416 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Controversies persist regarding the association between blood pressure (BP) and the risks of cognitive impairment and dementia due to inconsistent definitions of BP exposure and varying population characteristics. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 12,327 patients who underwent randomization (6162 to the asundexian group and 6165 to the placebo group), the incidence of ischemic stroke was lower in the asundexian group than in the placebo group (6.2% vs. 8.4%; cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.84; P<0.001). 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 12,327 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Physical exercise has been shown to increase brain volume and improve cognition in randomized trials of non-demented elderly. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The advent of proteomics offers an unprecedented opportunity to predict dementia onset. 1 key finding →
Participants: 52,645 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We conducted the largest metabolome investigation of dementia to date, for the first time revealed the metabolite importance ranking, and highlighted the contribution of plasma metabolites for dementia prediction. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 274,160 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The treatment of ischaemic stroke with neuroprotective drugs has been unsuccessful, and whether these compounds can be used to reduce disability after recurrent stroke is unknown. 4 key findings →
Participants: 20,332 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Hearing impairment was recently identified as the most prominent risk factor for dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 165,550 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The prevalence of A+T+N+F+ profile was 66.24% in clinically diagnosed AD dementia patients; similarly, the majority of individuals with reduced FDG-PET were AD dementia subjects. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 551 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Low hemoglobin and anemia are associated with cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 6,833 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Disturbing dreams were reported by 24.2% overall and all-cause dementia, and AD incidence was 10.8 and 5.3 per 1000 person-years, respectively. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 10,238 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a complex disease shaped by genetic and environmental factors, including the gut microbiome. 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,167 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
At baseline, Aβ+ participants showed higher CP FWf, increased white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume, and decreased diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 216 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Three survey rounds included 49 to 54 participants that agreed on VasCog-2 diagnostic criteria for preclinical, mild, and major dementia levels of vascular cognitive impairment (under the overarching term VCID). 5 key findings →
Participants: 49 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
It was not possible to demonstrate significant differences on the co-primary clinical endpoints (ADAS-cog 11 and ADCS-ADL 23 ) at 52 weeks due to symptomatic activity in the control arm. 5 key findings →
Design: phase-3-trial Participants: 598 Evidence: null result
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
To assess plasma phosphorylated tau181 (p-tau181) as a progression biomarker in Alzheimer's disease (AD), we examined longitudinal plasma p-tau181 of 1184 participants (403 cognitively normal (CN), 560 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and 221 with AD dementia) from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,184 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The relationship between mild behavioral impairment (MBI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is intricate and still not well investigated. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 1,129 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma GFAP and pTau biomarkers (pTau181, pTau231, pTau217) are significantly elevated in Aβ-positive individuals, with stronger Aβ–pTau associations observed in APOE ε4 carriers (CPAS: β = 0.26, p = 0.003 for pTau231; ADNI: β = 0.45, p < 0.001 for pTau181). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 806 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma NfL level is a valuable noninvasive biomarker that supplements magnetic resonance imaging scans and possibly reflects the severity of CSVD burden. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 496 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A biological research framework to define Alzheimer' disease with dichotomized biomarker measurement was proposed by National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA). 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled.
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →