With one of the scores, higher adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was associated with a reduced risk of AD and all-cause dementia. 5 key findings →
Participants: 25,898
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Examining the risk of clinically diagnosed dementia in older adults, our study found a 65% increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia in individuals with diabetes compared with those without. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Among a cohort of 118 006 individuals, the incident rate (IR) of dementia was 0.56/1000 person-years over a median follow-up period of 1.54 years among SGLT-2i users compared with 2.67/1000 person-years in DPP-4i users, over a median follow-up period of 1.79 years. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Hypertension is known to be a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, but its relationship with cognitive impairment and dementia is an emerging area of study. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
In this retrospective, confounder-adjusted study, anticoagulation was associated with slower cognitive/functional decline and lower hospitalization/mortality risk in AF and dementia patients. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 291
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
49/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 49 out of 100.
·
PLoS Medicine
·
2025-09-17
This was a retrospective analysis using nationally representative UK general practice population between 1998 and 2018, from electronic health records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink, CPRD, GOLD). 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,219,732
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
48/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100.
·
Sleep
·
2016-11-01
Study objectives Emerging evidence suggests a role for sleep in contributing to the progression of Alzheimer disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Higher phosphatidylcholine intake was associated with lower risk of incident dementia and better cognitive performance in men in eastern Finland. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Trouble falling or staying asleep, poor sleep quality, and short or long sleep duration are gaining attention as potential risk factors for cognitive decline and dementia, including Alzheimer's disease. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
After adjusting for sex, years of education, smoking status, diabetes, hypertension, apolipoprotein E ε4 carriership, and hearing rehabilitation (defined as hearing aid or cochlear implant use), neither PTA (hazard ratio [HR] per 10-decibels hearing level increase of 0·99 (95% CI 0·89-1·12; p=0·91) nor WRS (HR per 10% decrease of 0·98, 95% CI 0·89-1 ·07; p=0·65) was significantly associated with the development of dementia. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The Framingham 10-risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) has been a widely studied estimate of cardiovascular risk in the general population. 4 key findings →
Participants: 179
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
A consequence of our progressively ageing global population is the increasing prevalence of worldwide age-related cognitive decline and dementia. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
48/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100.
·
EBioMedicine
·
2025-12-09
Without adaptation, ADD heatwave-attributable deaths are projected to rise sharply, especially under rapid socioeconomic development with high greenhouse gas emissions scenario (SSP5-RCP8.5) in the 2080s, which reach 59,088-an 11-fold (+1003%) increase comparing to 2010s levels. 5 key findings →
Participants: 399,036
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
A higher degree of neighborhood disadvantage may contribute to the excess risk of MCI or dementia found among AA. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 2,733
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The 12 risk factors account for 60.3% of dementia cases in China, including 14.0% in early life, 8.8% in midlife, and 37.5% in later life. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Older adults in rural India experience higher social isolation due to limited social and healthcare resources. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 71,513
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
The direct associations identified may present potential intervention targets, while the indirect relationships suggest that other factors are influential in the pathway linking social isolation and loneliness with chronic disease and dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 6,670
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Growing evidence underscores the importance of cardiovascular contributions to Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (AD/ADRD). 5 key findings →
Design: narrative review
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
= 0.005). Cox regression analysis revealed that polypharmacy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of MCI progression to dementia (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31 to 0.78) after adjusting for covariates. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
High LDL-C (≥160 mg/dL) increased AD risk across all groups {hazard ratio (HR): 1.23 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.10-1.38],p<0.001;HR: 1.45 (95% CI: 1.08-1.93),p=0.013;HR: 1.25 (95% CI: 1.10-1.42),p<0.001, respectively}, whereas low LDL-C (<70 mg/dL) showed higher VD risk in those not taking cholesterol-lowering medication [HR: 3.02 (95% CI: 1.73-5.27),p<0.001].Low HDL-C (≤40 mg/dL) was associated with increased AD and VD risk in non-users. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Elevated CKM risk level is significantly associated with increased risks of cognitive decline and dementia incidence. 3 key findings →
Participants: 426
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
During a median 13.7 years of follow-up, prediabetes (n=52,693) was associated with higher risks of vascular dementia (hazard ratio (HR):1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.61), stroke (HR:1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.16), ischemic stroke (HR:1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.19), and intracerebral hemorrhage (HR:1.19; 95% CI: 1.01-1.39) compared with normoglycemia, after adjustment for major confounding factors and across extensive sensitivity analyses. 5 key findings →
Participants: 52,693
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
During a median 13.7 years of follow-up, prediabetes (n=52,693) was associated with higher risks of vascular dementia (hazard ratio (HR):1.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.14-1.61), stroke (HR:1.09; 95% CI: 1.01-1.16), ischemic stroke (HR:1.10; 95% CI: 1.02-1.19), and intracerebral hemorrhage (HR:1.19; 95% CI: 1.01-1.39) compared with normoglycemia, after adjustment for major confounding factors and across extensive sensitivity analyses. 5 key findings →
Participants: 52,693
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
117 participants have complete data (mean age: 73 ± 7.4). 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study
Participants: 150
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
MCI and dementia were common among survivors from the original ARIC cohort.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 30,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.