Patients who started ChEI therapy after the introduction of the coverage policy had a significantly longer persistence. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Patients who started ChEI therapy after the introduction of the coverage policy had a significantly longer persistence. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Overall, 74 studies containing 92 cases were found of MDs related to ACHEIs. 5 key findings →
Participants: 33 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
No statistically significant improvement in the primary outcome measures (MMSE and ADAS-Cog) was observed with drug therapy at 36 weeks, at which point all groups had lost, on average, 1 point on the MMSE and gained 2-3 points on the ADAS-Cog scale compared with baseline. 5 key findings →
Participants: 938 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The outcomes of the present study aim to elucidate the significance of the PDE4 inhibition mechanism as a prospective therapeutic target for enhancing cognitive function in individuals with (a)MCI and mild AD dementia. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of depressive symptoms, cognitive functions, and ADL. 5 key findings →
Participants: 100 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In trials of lecanemab, aducanumab, and donanemab, incidence of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities with active treatment ranged from 22% to 44%, the vast majority of which presumably led to unblinding. 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The etiology of cerebrovascular pathology is heterogeneous. 3 key findings →
Participants: 29 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) are the principal safety concern limiting anti-amyloid therapies for Alzheimer's disease, yet their biology remains unclear. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control Participants: 3 Evidence: preliminary
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The authors estimated the effects of each of the three commonly used drugs for Alzheimer disease (donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine) in terms of predefined clinical outcomes and trial completion rates, by dosing level, and described differences among them. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical trial was carried out to compare 24-week periods of treatment with 1 g acetyl-l-carnitine twice daily and placebo in the treatment of patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type. 3 key findings →
Participants: 36 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Selegiline, an inhibitor of monoamine oxidase B, was tested on patients with mild to moderate dementia of the Alzheimer type. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The results of this review will determine the efficacy and safety of herbal medicine for AD. 2 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
L-deprenyl did not have a measurable impact on behavior or cognitive function over a 2-month period in this group of subjects with mild DAT. 1 key finding →
Participants: 39 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective strategy in some treatment-resistant patients with schizophrenia. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Our results suggest that risperidone may affect the CSF profile of AD biomarkers indicating more amyloid pathology. 5 key findings →
Participants: 44 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The rigorous methodology of the study will hopefully move forward the scientific evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine in treatment of VaD. 3 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 372 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Cognitive alterations show greatest correlation with total CGIC. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Two randomized controlled trials were included, one was scale A, and the other was scale B. The rates of abnormal liver function, withdrawal from treatment, and withdrawal due to adverse effects were higher in the treatment group (OR = 7.86, 95%CI: 2.50-24.69; OR = 4.70, 95%CI: 2.61-8.44; and OR = 5.47, 95%CI: 3.01-9.94; respectively) compared with the placebo group. 3 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 710 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia is one of the greatest global challenges for health and social care in the 21st century. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Depression predisposes to medical illnesses and advances biological aging indicated by shorter telomere length, accelerated brain aging and advanced epigenetic aging. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease (AD), the leading cause of dementia, is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Although the use of hormone therapy to prevent chronic conditions in postmenopausal women is associated with some benefits, there are also well-documented harms. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These pathological changes lead to widespread neuronal damage, significantly impacting daily functioning and quality of life. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Accurate diagnosis of vascular dementia is important for the recognition of underlying pathophysiology and the institution of appropriate therapy. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Alzheimer disease is progressive and irreversible, but pharmacologic therapies for cognitive impairment and nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments for the behavioral problems associated with dementia can enhance quality of life. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
10 of the 3,071 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →