29,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Pharmacologic treatments for Alzheimer's disease include the cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The efficacy of a centrally active cholinesterase inhibitor, rivastigmine tartrate (ENA 713; Exelon, in patients with mild to moderately severe Alzheimer's disease was evaluated in a 26-week open-label extension of a 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. 1 key finding →
Design: open-label trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Memantine (Ebixa, Axura, Namenda, Akatinol) is a moderate-affinity, uncompetitive, voltage-dependent, NMDA-receptor antagonist with fast on/off kinetics that inhibits excessive calcium influx induced by chronic overstimulation of the NMDA receptor. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Effective interventions in diet, medications, biochemical exposures, psychological condition, pre-existing disease and lifestyle may decrease new incidence of AD. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Existing drugs for Alzheimer's disease provide symptomatic benefit for up to 12 months, but there are no approved disease-modifying therapies. 1 key finding →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Ankylosing spondylitis is associated with increased risk for vascular mortality. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 473 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Continued lithium treatment was associated with reduction of the rate of dementia to the same level as that for the general population. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 16,238 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We reviewed epidemiological and experimental studies of female gonadal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on cognitive function in post-menopausal women and carried out meta-analyses. 1 key finding →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Current pharmacological therapy for Alzheimer's disease (AD) includes the cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) donepezil, rivastigmine, and galantamine and the N-methyl D-aspartate receptor antagonist memantine. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Among patients with breast cancer, tamoxifen and steroidal aromatase inhibitors were associated with a decrease in the number who received a diagnosis of NDD, specifically Alzheimer disease and dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
For the cohort of patients that remained on therapy > or =60 days, the mean time to treatment discontinuation was 331 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 307-355) for rivastigmine patients (n = 392) versus 337 days (95% CI, 322-352) for donepezil patients (n = 1288). 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 392 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Twelve studies were included in the final analysis. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This study investigated the association of statin use with sepsis risk in patients with dementia. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 308 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The COMCID trial will identify the therapeutic potential of cilostazol. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Donanemab treatment significantly slowed clinical progression at 76w and had a safety profile consistent with earlier studies. 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,182 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Benefit continued to accrue with ongoing lecanemab treatment through 36 months. 5 key findings →
Design: phase-3-trial Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Donanemab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the insoluble form of β-amyloid found in plaques, significantly slows cognitive and functional decline of AD in participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or mild AD-related dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: phase-3-trial Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Employing time-dependent proportional hazards modeling, the authors found no significant association between statin use and incident dementia or probable AD. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 312 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This study shows significant therapeutic effects of trazodone 50 mg in community-dwelling AD patients with SD. 3 key findings →
Participants: 15 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Apathy is a common behavioral symptom of Alzheimer's disease (AD), being present in up to 70% of patients. 4 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Alzheimer is a disease leading to various neuropsychiatric behavioral disorders, and the most common symptom observed during the prognosis of Alzheimer's disease is dysmnesia. 1 key finding →
Participants: 60 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Study objectives We investigated the effectiveness of a lighting intervention tailored to maximally affect the circadian system as a nonpharmacological therapy for treating problems with sleep, mood, and behavior in persons with Alzheimer disease and related dementias (ADRD). 3 key findings →
Participants: 46 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Treatment with celecoxib or naproxen did not improve depressive symptoms over time compared with placebo. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 2,528 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The expected outcome is to ensure the continuity of care from clinical practice to the patient's home, enabling also cost effectiveness and the empowerment of patient and caregiver in the care process, positively impacting on their quality of life. 1 key finding →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 30 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Naproxen may attenuate cognitive decline in slow decliners while accelerating decline in fast decliners. 2 key findings →
Participants: 2,388 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
10 of the 3,504 studies in this tag that have a study page, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 29,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 29,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (63.3% of the library) and OpenAlex (17.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,037 records (3.5% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →