31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Studies of long-term cognitive change should account for the potential effects of education on the outcome, since some studies have demonstrated an association of education with dementia risk. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 14,020 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Social determinants of health (SDHs) are the primary drivers of preventable health inequities, and the associations between SDHs and health outcomes among individuals with type 2 diabetes remain unclear. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 17 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Identifying independent and interactive associations of a wide range of diseases and multimorbidity and apolipoprotein E4 (APOE4) with dementia may help promote cognitive health. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 471,485 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The association between vascular risk factors and dementia varies with age, making generalizability of dementia risk prediction rules to individuals of different ages challenging. 4 key findings →
Participants: 4,899 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
However, not all plant-based foods are necessarily beneficial for dementia or depression. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 180,532 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The association between blood pressure and dementia is debated. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 6,668 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
We observed 234 cases of all-cause dementia over 10 years of follow-up. 4 key findings →
Participants: 2,457 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Numerous studies have investigated the impacts of common types of chronic pain (CP) on patients' cognitive function and observed that CP was associated with later dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 354,943 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Differences between users and non-users of insulin, metformin and sulfonylurea were assessed in each cohort for cognitive and brain MRI measures using linear regression models, and cognitive decline and dementia/AD risk using mixed effect models and Cox regression analyses, respectively. 4 key findings →
Participants: 3,590 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We analyzed data from 11,709 participants without a history of coronary heart disease or stroke who attended the baseline examination (1987-1989) of the prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. 4 key findings →
Participants: 11,709 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Understanding how dementia risk is impacted by timing of smoking cessation has public health implications for prevention efforts. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,347 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Many studies have explored whether individual plasma protein biomarkers improve cardiovascular disease risk prediction. 4 key findings →
Participants: 4,857 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Several studies suggested that women are at higher risk of dementia than men. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 7,046 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Although memory complaints are associated with an increased risk of Alzheimer's disease in persons with cognitive impairment as well as in persons with normal cognition, they are commonly considered of less importance than objective cognitive measures. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 7,983 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Women's reproductive factors have been associated with the risk of dementia; however, these findings remain uncertain. 4 key findings →
Participants: 273,240 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma proteins affect biological processes and are common drug targets but their role in the development of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias remains unclear. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Recent studies have associated immune abnormalities with dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 50,864 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Whether the association of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) with dementia differs by sex remains unclear, and the role of socioeconomic, lifestyle, genetic, and medical factors in their association is unknown. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 502,649 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Chronic obesity is associated with several complications, including cognitive impairment and dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
It has been suggested that the risk might be particularly increased for carriers of the APOE-epsilon4 allele. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 6,645 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Although sleep, physical activity and sedentary behavior have been found to be associated with dementia risk, findings are inconsistent and their joint relationship remains unclear. 4 key findings →
Participants: 431,924 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Analyses were performed within the Rotterdam Study (baseline 1997), a prospective, population-based cohort. 4 key findings →
Participants: 9,446 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Hemoglobin A 1c (HbA 1c ), a measure of average blood glucose level, is associated with the risk of dementia and cognitive impairment. 4 key findings →
Participants: 13,000 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We aimed to evaluate the link between severe hypoglycaemia and domain-specific cognitive decline, smaller brain volumes and dementia in adults with type 2 diabetes, which so far has been relatively poorly characterised. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 580 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Setting and participants A total of 316,669 participants [mean (SD) age, 56.3 (8.1) years] without prior cardiovascular disease or dementia from the UK Biobank study at baseline survey (2006-2010) were enrolled. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 316,669 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events