The global burden associated with physical inactivity is substantial. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
31,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The global burden associated with physical inactivity is substantial. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cardiovascular risk factors often cluster into a metabolic syndrome that may increase the risk of dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 5 721 711 patients (3 302 579 female and 2 419 132 male) with incident dementia between 2014 and 2021 were included in the study. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 711 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Level of conscientiousness is a risk factor for Alzheimer disease. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 176 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
High blood pressure is one of the most important risk factors for ischaemic heart disease, stroke, other cardiovascular diseases, chronic kidney disease and dementia. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study sought to determine the prevalence and impact of pain in a nationally representative sample of older adults in the United States. 3 key findings →
Participants: 7,601 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Level of cognitively stimulating activity in old age is related to risk of developing dementia. 4 key findings →
Participants: 90 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Higher cardiovascular risk burden may predict decline in episodic memory, working memory, and perceptual speed and is associated with neurodegeneration and vascular lesions in the brain. 4 key findings →
Participants: 378 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Prevalence: It is estimated that each year 38.2% of the EU population suffers from a mental disorder. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The burden of comorbidity in people with epilepsy is high. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
From 1990 to 2019, the Alzheimer's disease burden increased worldwide. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Stroke is a leading cause of disability, dementia and death worldwide. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Late-life depression is characterized by slowed information processing, which affects all realms of cognition. 2 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Age-related white matter changes (ARWMC) on brain MRI have been associated with cognitive, motor, mood and urinary disturbances. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Exposure to ambient air pollution is a well-established determinant of health and disease. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our study suggests that being a caregiver who is experiencing mental or emotional strain is an independent risk factor for mortality among elderly spousal caregivers.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Description The American College of Physicians developed this guidance statement to guide clinicians in selecting targets for pharmacologic treatment of type 2 diabetes. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The number of patients surviving with congenital heart disease (CHD) has soared over the last 3 decades. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cognitive dysfunction is increasingly recognized as an important comorbidity of diabetes mellitus. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The QOL-AD seems to be reliable and valid for individuals with MMSE scores greater than 10. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
499·2 million new cases of preventable major NCDs would occur globally by 2030 if the prevalence of physical inactivity does not change, with direct health-care costs of INT$520 billion. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 36 251 participants were included with a median follow-up time of 13.9 years. 5 key findings →
Participants: 251 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
ED screening tools in population-based studies are a major source of discrepancy. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Uptake of carbon 11-labeled Pittsburgh Compound B ([(11)C]PiB) was measured for participants assessed between August 15, 2003, and January 8, 2008, at the Washington University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and diagnosed either as nondemented (n = 161) or with dementia of the Alzheimer type (n = 37). 1 key finding →
Participants: 161 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our literature search resulted in 32 studies published until October 2012. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (66% of the library) and OpenAlex (16%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,052 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events