Of the 1388 studies identified, 70 met the inclusion criteria for this review. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
30,580 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Of the 1388 studies identified, 70 met the inclusion criteria for this review. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
GLP-1RA use was associated with lower risk of dementia (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71–0.91) and Alzheimer’s disease (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.59–0.98) compared to DPP4is. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 12,351 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Our study reveals that PS in DLB is associated with specific deficits in attention and visuospatial/executive function, alongside more severe neuropsychiatric symptoms. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 35 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Synucleinopathies, such as Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies, and multiple system atrophy, are characterized by the aggregation of α-synuclein. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These findings suggest that HB-CCT via Neurotablet can effectively enhance specific cognitive abilities in PD, supporting the role of digital, home-based interventions as feasible strategies to mitigate cognitive decline. 4 key findings →
Design: post-hoc analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The glymphatic system, a vital brain perivascular network for waste clearance, hinges on the functionality of the aquaporin 4 (AQP4) water channel. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 1154 participants (46% men, mean age 70.9±8.7 years), 92 (8%) developed stroke over a median follow-up of 8.6 years (Q1-Q3: 5.1-12.5). 5 key findings →
Participants: 1,154 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) is associated with vascular cognitive impairment, dementia, and stroke. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 59 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The mean age of the participants was 68 ± 9 years and 39% were female. 5 key findings →
Design: post-hoc analysis Participants: 759 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD) exhibit distinct neuropathological hallmarks, with AD defined by cortical amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, while VaD arises primarily from cerebrovascular disease (CeVD). 4 key findings →
Participants: 531 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Antibodies to alpha-synuclein (AS) now provide a sensitive and specific method for the detection of Lewy bodies (LBs) and their use will allow a more accurate determination of the prevalence of LBs in Alzheimer's Disease (AD).
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Small vessel disease encompasses lacunar stroke, white matter hyperintensities, lacunes and microbleeds. 5 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Since 1994, a population-based study of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) in The Netherlands has aimed to ascertain all patients with FTD, and first prevalence estimates based on 74 patients were reported in 1998. 1 key finding →
Participants: 74 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Twenty-two patients with Parkinson's disease drawn from a community-based study were followed prospectively until their deaths. 2 key findings →
Participants: 18 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Visual hallucinations are common symptoms in Parkinson's disease and are most likely of multifactorial origin. 5 key findings →
Participants: 30 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Semantic dementia is a syndrome of progressive deterioration in semantic memory (knowledge of objects, people, concepts and words). 1 key finding →
Participants: 13 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
There is a consistent pattern of vulnerability to LB formation across subcortical, paralimbic, and neocortical structures that is similar for DLB cases with or without concomitant AD. 4 key findings →
Participants: 25 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The difficulty in differentiating progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP, also called Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome) from other related disorders was the incentive for a study to determine the clinical features that best distinguish PSP. 5 key findings →
Participants: 24 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Study results highlight a critical need for better prognostic counseling and education for persons and families living with DLB. 4 key findings →
Participants: 658 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Temporoparietal hypoperfusion on SPECT is common to both AD and DLB. 2 key findings →
Participants: 23 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A 1-minute semantic fluency test can assist in early detection of dementia in the memory clinic setting. 3 key findings →
Participants: 98 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Within this region, we defined a 42-SNP haplotype that was associated with significantly increased risk of ALS (p=7·47×10(-33) when people with familial ALS were compared with controls, odds ratio 21·0, 95% CI 11·2-39·1) and which overlapped with an association locus recently reported for frontotemporal dementia. 1 key finding →
Participants: 40 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are overlapping, fatal neurodegenerative disorders in which the molecular and pathogenic basis remains poorly understood. 5 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
LPA is associated with Abeta amyloidosis, suggesting that subclassification of PPA based on language features can help predict the likelihood of AD pathology. 3 key findings →
Participants: 15 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In contrast, all Alzheimer's disease variants showed diffuse patterns of (11)C-labelled Pittsburgh compound B binding, with posterior cortical atrophy additionally showing elevated uptake in occipital cortex compared with early-onset Alzheimer's disease. 4 key findings →
Participants: 17 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
10 of the 2,823 studies in this tag that have a study page, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (64.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,037 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events