30,980 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Good sleep is essential for health, yet associations between sleep and dementia risk remain incompletely understood. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 5,946 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We found that multiple sleep measures predicted future risk of stroke and dementia, but these associations were attenuated after controlling for cardiovascular risk factors and were absent in MR analyses for Alzheimer disease. 4 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 502,383 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Although loneliness and social isolation have been linked to an increased risk of non-communicable diseases such as cardiovascular disease and dementia, their association with the risk of severe infection is uncertain. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 905 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia risk may be attenuated by physical activity (PA); however, the specific activity levels optimal for dementia prevention are unclear. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,604 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Increasing evidence suggests an association between pro-inflammatory diets and cognitive function. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,372 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Grip strength and walking pace have been linked to cognitive dysfunction. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 340,212 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The Rotterdam Study previously found that higher dietary intakes of vitamins E and C related to lower risk of dementia and Alzheimer disease (AD) over 6 years of follow-up. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 5,395 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Extensive evidence shows the beneficial effect of adhering to a regular physical activity (PA) pattern on brain health. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 75,629 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
However, not all plant-based foods are necessarily beneficial for dementia or depression. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 180,532 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Unsaturated fatty acids are important constituents of neuronal cell membranes and have neuroprotective, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory properties. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 5,289 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
We observed 234 cases of all-cause dementia over 10 years of follow-up. 4 key findings →
Participants: 2,457 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Delirium is a distressing neurocognitive disorder recently linked to sleep disturbances. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 818 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
From the population-based Rotterdam Study, 4,447 participants underwent dietary assessment and brain MRI scanning between 2005 and 2015. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 4,447 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Although sleep, physical activity and sedentary behavior have been found to be associated with dementia risk, findings are inconsistent and their joint relationship remains unclear. 4 key findings →
Participants: 431,924 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Poor social health is likely associated with cognitive decline and risk of dementia; however, studies show inconsistent results. 4 key findings →
Participants: 4,514 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We aimed to investigate whether the increased risk of dementia among individuals with diabetes can be offset by a broad combination of healthy lifestyle factors. 4 key findings →
Participants: 167,946 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
A high adherence to the Mediterranean-Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension Diet Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) has been associated with better cognition and a lower risk of dementia in some but not all studies. 4 key findings →
Participants: 120,661 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Median follow-up was 7.5 years (interquartile range: 7.0 to 9.0 years), during this time 387 participants (0.8 %) were diagnosed with dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 47,371 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Linear MR suggested that each additional hour/day of sleep was associated with 1% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0-2%; P = 0.008] slower reaction time and 3% more errors in visual-memory test (95% CI = 0-6%; P = 0.05). 4 key findings →
Participants: 395 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Increased homocysteine levels might accelerate dopaminergic cell death in Parkinson disease (PD), through neurotoxic effects. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 5,289 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
During follow-up, 60 individuals developed dementia, of which 49 had Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →
Participants: 1,322 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The positive association of choline for cognition has been reported in both animal and human studies, yet the associations of choline with the risks of incident dementia or Alzheimer's disease (AD) in humans is unclear. 4 key findings →
Participants: 3,224 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sleep is essential for life, including daily cognitive processes, yet the amount of sleep required for optimal brain health as we grow older is unclear. 4 key findings →
Participants: 479,420 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Sedentary behavior (SB) is associated with cardiometabolic disease and mortality, but its association with dementia is currently unclear. 4 key findings →
Participants: 146,651 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Vitamin D has gained interest as a potentially modifiable risk factor for dementia because of its putative neuroprotective effects. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 6,220 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,980 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,980 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.2% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.4%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,040 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 965 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events