Cell cycle (CC) reentry in neurons precedes the formation of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Cell cycle (CC) reentry in neurons precedes the formation of amyloid-β (Aβ) plaques in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Presenilin 1 (PS1), a causative molecule of familial Alzheimer's disease (AD), is known to be an unprimed substrate of glycogen synthase kinase 3 β (GSK3β) [Twomey and McCarthy (2006) FEBS Lett 580:4015-4020] and is phosphorylated at serine 353, 357 residues in its cytoplasmic loop region [Kirschenbaum et al. (2001) J Biol Chem 276:7366-7375]. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A key event in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the conversion of the peptide beta-amyloid (Abeta) from its soluble monomeric form into various aggregated morphologies in the brain. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A novel presenilin-1 (PS1) mutation (P117S) in an American pedigree is described. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The 42-amino acid fragment of amyloid β (Aβ1-42) in cerebrospinal fluid has continued to be important for detecting cerebral β-amyloidosis in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Genetically engineered mice have been generated to model cerebral β-amyloidosis, one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology, based on the overexpression of a mutated cDNA of the amyloid-β precursor protein (AβPP) or by knock-in of the murine Aβpp gene alone or with presenilin1 mutations. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The association between apolipoprotein E (apoE) and amyloid-β peptide (Aβ) may significantly impact the function of both proteins, thus affecting the etiology of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
B/A4 is the major component of brain amyloid plaque, one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Previous studies have shown a marked decline in neuronal and an increase in glial gene expression in Alzheimer's disease (AD) neocortex. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Cerebral small vessel disease (cSVD) is a leading cause of stroke and dementia. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Genome-wide genotypes were quality-controlled, imputed, functionally annotated (yielding 16,935 gene regions comprising 90,607 functional variants), and associated with latent EEG features using Bayesian reduced rank regression. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
INTRODUCTIONAPOE*{varepsilon}4 is the strongest genetic risk factor for Alzheimers disease (AD), yet its effect varies across ancestral populations. 1 key finding →
Participants: 2,733 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSINTRODUCTIONC_ST_ABSThe Collaborative Amish Aging and Memory Project (CAAMP) is an ongoing longitudinal study spanning multiple sites, focused on cognitive function and age-related traits in Midwestern Amish (Ohio and Indiana) communities. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 3,978 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Aβ42/40 and Aβ37/42 ratios were associated with AAO across PSEN2 variants, strongly driven by PSEN2 variants with PSEN1 homologs. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
These findings support a model in which p-tau217 specifically tracks amyloid-driven pathological progression, while markers of neurodegeneration reflect broader age-related processes that are not associated with APOE genotype. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 60 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The blood-based biomarker (BBM) profiles associated with genetic susceptibility to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in general older populations remain poorly understood. 3 key findings →
Participants: 3,947 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Educational attainment and physical activity PRSs were associated with AD in both sexes. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Participants: 27,751 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The observed phenotypic and genetic associations highlight shared underlying mechanisms among plasma biomarkers. 2 key findings →
Participants: 696 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Untargeted mass spectrometry remains underutilised for blood-based biomarker discovery in dementia research from large cohorts, where affinity-based approaches dominate. 3 key findings →
Participants: 14,258 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events