31,380 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Lower baseline amyloid beta (Aβ)42/40 ratio and higher phosphorylated tau 181 (p-tau181), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light chain (NfL) were associated with an increased risk of MCI and dementia; GFAP was most strongly associated. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,467 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The likelihood of amyloid positivity was associated with age and APOE ε4 status. 3 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 377 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We discovered age-dependent genetic effects, established associations between vascular-related genes (KLKB1, F12, PLIN2) and midlife plasma aβ levels, and identified a plausible Alzheimer's Disease candidate gene (ITPRIP) influencing cell death. 4 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 725 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In TRIAD, ALZpath p-tau217 (β = 0.45, p = 0.02) and p-tau217+Janssen (β = 0.67, p = 0.002), and in ADNI p-tau217 (β = 0.90, p = 0.002) increased faster in A+E4+. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 2,039 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Participants had a mean (SD) age of 66.9 (9.9) years; 971 (33.3%) were Aβ positive by either CSF or PET, 1667 (57.2%) were women, and 1108 (38.1%) carried at least 1 APOE ε4 allele. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 2,916 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Recently, several genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have led to the discovery of nine new loci of genetic susceptibility in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 2 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 2,025 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In community and clinical settings, SCC predict both dementia and depression in the absence of dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 6,357 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
To define Alzheimer's disease with biomarkers rather than clinical assessment, we assessed prediction of research-diagnosed disease status using these biomarkers and tested genetic variants associated with the biomarkers that may reflect more accurately the risk of biochemically defined Alzheimer's disease instead of the risk of dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 1,439 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Blood biomarkers have great potential to advance clinical care and accelerate trials in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 70 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Emerging plasma biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease might be non-invasive tools to trace early Alzheimer's disease-related abnormalities such as the accumulation of amyloid-beta peptides, neurofibrillary tau tangles, glial activation and neurodegeneration. 4 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 164 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The Core 1 biomarker PGSs predicted AD pathology and associated cognitive performance better than the AD PGSs in both populations. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 515 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
SORL1 is associated with AD in the Hong Kong Chinese population. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Prospective cohort studies have implied associations between blood levels of troponin T, troponin I, NT-proBNP, GDF15, dementia, and cognitive function, without providing evidence favoring possible causality. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 257,842 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We analyzed 1,240 MRIs from 473 patients (age: 69.2 ± 7.4 [range: 49-87]; 32.8% women). 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 1,240 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Nine proteins (amyloid-beta 42 (Aβ42), beta-secretase 1 (BACE1), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), pTau181, pTau231, pTau217, t0tal tau (MAPT), neurofilament light (NfL) and acetylcholinesterase (AChE)) robustly differed between carriers and non-carriers cross-sectionally. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 113 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Bisecting N-acetylglucosamine correlated with tau levels (p < 0.0001). 4 key findings →
Design: retrospective cohort Participants: 233 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Patients in the CBS-AD group had a longer diagnostic latency, relatively benign clinical trajectory, greater cognitive impairment, and higher APOE-ε4 allele frequency than those in the CBS-non-AD group (AUC, 0.80-0.87; P Conclusions and relevance These findings suggest that studies focusing on the PSP-RS subtype are likely to miss a large number of patients with underlying PSP tau pathology. 2 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 76 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The primary constituents of plaques (Aβ42/Aβ40) and neurofibrillary tangles (tau and phosphorylated forms of tau [ptau]) are the current leading diagnostic and prognostic cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers for AD. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 5,161 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The large number of participants screened with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) and standardized assessments provides an unprecedented opportunity to evaluate factors associated with elevated brain amyloid. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 4,486 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The clinical diagnosis of probable AD dementia demonstrated good agreement with biologically defined AD (positive predictive value 85.2%). 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 166 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Plasma markers can track biological change over time, with plasma pTau181 and GFAP markers showing longitudinal change in individuals with preclinical AD. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 373 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The use of PRSs may be beneficial for increased precision in risk estimates among APOE4 carriers. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 712 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
In conjunction with the NILVAD trial, a European Multicentre Double-Blind Placebo Controlled trial of Nilvadipine in Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD), there are four NILVAD substudies in which eligible NILVAD patients are also invited to participate. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The mechanisms by which the apolipoprotein E ε4 (APOEε4) allele influences the pathophysiological progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) are poorly understood. 2 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 94 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
We conclude that NPTX2 is a promising synapse-derived disease progression biomarker in genetic FTD. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 106 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 31,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (65.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.2%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,048 records (3.3% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 973 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events