30,580 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Nicotinamide riboside (NR) increases blood levels of NAD+, a cofactor central to energy metabolism, and improves brain function in some rodent models of neurodegeneration. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
A one standard deviation increase in AD-PGS was associated with an accelerated time to dementia diagnosis by 4.8 months. 5 key findings →
Design: prospective cohort Participants: 7,039 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Brain DNA methylation in multiple AD loci is associated with AD pathologies. 5 key findings →
Design: cohort study Participants: 447 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In subjects with MCI and evidence of amyloid pathology, the injury markers CSF t-tau and p-tau and hippocampal atrophy can predict further cognitive decline. 1 key finding →
Design: cohort study Participants: 110 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
One hundred and fifty probe-sets form an accurate classifier of young versus older muscle tissue and this healthy ageing RNA classifier performed consistently in independent cohorts of human muscle, skin and brain tissue (n = 594, AUC = 0.83-0.96) and thus represents a biomarker for biological age. 5 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 594 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
When proper normative values are used, only age and education, and not race or ethnicity, are associated with higher frequency of MCI. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Longitudinal fMRI provides a reliable indicator of brain activation over time, and may prove useful in identifying functional brain changes associated with cognitive decline on the trajectory toward clinical Alzheimer disease. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 21 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These initial data suggest that serum protein-based biomarkers can be combined with clinical information to accurately classify AD. 3 key findings →
Design: case-control study Participants: 197 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The CSF levels of Aβ42 but not total and phosphorylated tau were lower in APOE ε4 carriers compared with noncarriers irrespective of diagnostic group (cohort A). 3 key findings →
Participants: 105 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We retrospectively assessed the diagnostic accuracy of whole genome sequencing to detect the most common repeat expansion loci associated with neurological outcomes (AR, ATN1, ATXN1, ATXN2, ATXN3, ATXN7, C9orf72, CACNA1A, DMPK, FMR1, FXN, HTT, and TBP) using samples obtained within the National Health Service in England from patients who were suspected of having neurological disorders; previous PCR test results were used as the reference standard. 4 key findings →
Participants: 3,000 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Cerebrospinal fluid tau and CSF-Abeta42 have so far been studied in research settings, under conditions providing data on the optimal performance. 1 key finding →
Participants: 105 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
MCI diagnosis frequencies are substantively affected by the stringency of the criteria, but the relative rankings of MCI subtype diagnoses are fairly consistent regardless of the stringency of the criteria. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 373 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
These results suggest that GSTO locus variants may lower brain GSTO2 levels and consequently confer AD risk in older age. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Blood-based biomarkers offer strong potential to revolutionize diagnosis, trial enrolment and treatment monitoring in Alzheimer's disease (AD). 3 key findings →
Participants: 962 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Survivors of childhood cancer are prone to neurocognitive impairment and premature aging, raising concerns about early onset dementia. 3 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
For follow-up intervals of 2-4 years, the FCSRT-FR is more predictive than the LM-IR for identifying individuals with memory complaints who will develop incident AD. 1 key finding →
Participants: 86 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Approximately 40% of the subjects were APOE epsilon4 carriers. 2 key findings →
Participants: 494 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Of 214 participants, 48 showed no decline on any test, 126 showed decline on only 1 test in 1 or more domains, and 40 showed decline on 2 or more tests in 1 or more domains. 2 key findings →
Participants: 214 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In their study, Chen et al 1 examined the association between apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype and longitudinal cognitive trajectories among middle-aged and older East Asian adults participating in the Healthy Aging Longitudinal Study of Taiwan (HALST).Although sporadic late-onset Alzheimer disease (AD) is polygenic, APOE remains the strongest genetic determinant of AD risk, with carriers of the APOE ε4 allele having increased odds of developing AD dementia in a dose-dependent manner compared with APOE ε3 homozygotes. 1 key finding →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 21 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study comprehensively profiled the AD plasma proteome and serves as a foundation for a high-performance, blood-based test for clinical AD screening and staging. 2 key findings →
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The role of different cell types and their interactions in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex and open question. 2 key findings →
Participants: 24 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Although possession of the APOE epsilon4 allele is a risk factor for AD in old age, it does not modify the progression of the disease during the preclinical period. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The same vulnerable inhibitory neuron subtype was depleted in both AD and DLB. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Although apolipoprotein E (ApoE) ε4 is a well-established risk factor for Alzheimer disease, its role in the development of post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) remains uncertain. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort study Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We employed Stereo-seq combined with single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) to investigate the gene expression and cell composition changes in human hippocampus with or without Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 30,580 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 30,580 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (64.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (16.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,037 records (3.4% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 964 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →
Newest studies, as a dated timeline → Atom feed Where this research is being discussed: events