Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

Find studies

A note on reading research. One study is rarely the final word.

We try to note the size of a study, whether it was in humans or animals, and how early-stage the finding is. If a summary here doesn't make that clear, treat it with extra caution and check the original source.

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is the transitional stage between normal cognition and dementia and is associated with arterial stiffness, which may lead to cardiovascular disease. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

A Cognitive Task Force (CTF) was established for the MissionAD program with the aim of reducing the screen failure (SF) rate to ∼30% and thereby reduce unnecessary subject burden, site burden, and excess trial costs. 4 key findings →

Design: clinical trial Evidence: low

To the Editor: We have recently highlighted the potential pitfalls of amyloid-beta (Aβ) PET, suggesting that both Aβ and tau assessments are necessary to relate clinical symptoms to Alzheimer disease (AD) pathology.1 Herein, we would like to present 3 additional cases related to the clinical practice of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for AD. 4 key findings →

Design: clinical trial Evidence: low

Letter in response to the article by Wang et al. recently published in Alzheimer's & Dementia (Wang W, Wang Q, Qi X, Gurney M, Perry G, Volkow ND, Davis PB, Kaelber DC, Xu R. Associations of semaglutide with first-time diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: Target trial emulation using nationwide real-world data in the US. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

According to the latest report in 2024 by the World Health Organization, based on global data from 2021, Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and other forms of dementia rank seventh among the leading causes of death worldwide, with an estimated 1.8 million deaths. 5 key findings →

Evidence: low

The number of dementia cases continues to increase with Alzheimer's disease as the leading cause. 4 key findings →

Design: clinical trial Evidence: low

3D Team Care Management Trial: Study Design Features and Participant Characteristics

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 31 out of 100. Innovation in Aging 2020-12-01

This clinical trial was designed in partnership with a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan, with the goal of comparing two care management approaches for its MA policyholders age >65 living with cognitive vulnerability. 5 key findings →

Evidence: high

Genetic linkage studies suggest that Alzheimer's disease (AD) is genetically heterogeneous and that in several early onset families the disease locus is close to the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene on chromosome 21. 2 key findings →

Design: clinical trial Evidence: low

During the one-year follow-up, the intervention group showed a significant increase in mean cognitive scores (Addenbrooke's cognitive examination), rising from 73.94 to 82.32 (p < 0.001). 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

A double blind, comparative, parallel and randomized clinical trial was used for evaluation of two nootropics with anti-aging actions: Meclofenoxate (MF) and Antagonic-Stress (AS). 3 key findings →

Evidence: high

[Aducanumab and Alzheimer's disease: a critical reflection.]

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 27 out of 100. Recenti progressi in medicina 2021-07-01

On June 7, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved aducanumab, a monoclonal amyloid targeting β-amyloid, for the treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD). 4 key findings →

Design: clinical trial Evidence: low

[Alzheimer's disease-Which substances are at present in phase III studies?]

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 27 out of 100. Der Nervenarzt 2022-03-14

The recent approval of aduhelm/aducanumab by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in June 2021 raised hopes that further substances against Alzheimer's disease might be approved in the near future. 4 key findings →

Evidence: low

Empowering family caregivers of patients with ADOD in a personalized DCEP provides durable reductions in patient hospitalizations and medical costs. 3 key findings →

Evidence: low

The Phase 2a TOGETHER trial tested bepranemab, an antibody targeting the tau protein (rather than amyloid), in 466 people with prodromal-to-mild Alzheimer's disease over 80 weeks. 3 key findings →

Design: phase-2-trial Participants: 466 Evidence: early

Eli Lilly's newer anti-amyloid antibody remternetug showed fast, dose-dependent removal of amyloid plaques in a small early trial: three-quarters of people getting the higher doses had their brain amyloid drop below the threshold used to call a scan 'positive' within about six months. 5 key findings →

Design: RCT Participants: 41 Evidence: early

Trontinemab is designed with a molecular 'shuttle' that helps it cross into the brain more efficiently than older anti-amyloid antibodies, aiming for faster plaque removal at lower doses. 5 key findings →

Design: phase-2-trial Participants: 13 Evidence: early

Mivelsiran takes a completely different approach from antibody drugs: it's injected into the spinal fluid and uses RNA interference to tell brain cells to make less of the amyloid precursor protein in the first place, rather than clearing plaques after they form. 5 key findings →

Design: phase-1-trial Participants: 19 Evidence: preliminary

This was the pivotal, large-scale trial meant to prove whether simufilam, a controversial experimental Alzheimer's drug, actually works. 5 key findings →

Design: phase-3-trial Participants: 804 Evidence: null result

In September 2024 the SEC announced that Cassava Sciences and three individuals tied to the company agreed to pay over $40 million combined to settle federal charges that they misled investors about a 2020 Phase 2 trial of simufilam. 5 key findings →

Evidence: high

Elderly patients with AD hypovitaminosis D are at increased risk for hip fracture. 3 key findings →

Participants: 29 Evidence: low

A high incidence of fractures, particularly of the hip, represents an important problem in patients with Alzheimer disease (AD), who are prone to falls and have osteoporosis. 2 key findings →

Participants: 15 Evidence: low

The results presented are sufficiently encouraging to recommend that the DEMQOL instruments be used alongside a generic measure such as the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) in future studies of interventions in dementia as there was evidence that they can be more sensitive for patients at the milder end of disease and some limited evidence that the person with dementia measure may be able to reflect deterioration. 2 key findings →

Design: clinical trial Participants: 644 Evidence: low

A head-to-head comparison of multiple amyloid PET radiotracers for Down syndrome clinical trials

⚠ Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. medRxiv 2025-03-19

Adults with Down syndrome carry high risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease and efforts to include this population in clinical trials remain limited. 4 key findings →

Design: longitudinal study Participants: 237 Evidence: moderate

From across this tag

10 of the 1,854 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.

↑ Change the filters

Where “Free full text” comes from

Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read

How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped

This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.

  • Journal tier up to 10 pts
  • Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
  • Study design up to 12 pts
  • Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
  • Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
  • How recent up to 5 pts
  • Sample size up to 4 pts
  • Effect reported up to 3 pts
  • Studied in people up to 3 pts
  • Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
  • Times cited up to 7 pts
  • Citations per year up to 5 pts
  • Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
  • Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
  • Still being cited up to 4 pts
  • Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
  • Institution's track record up to 3 pts
  • Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
  • Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
  • Free to read up to 2 pts

Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.

Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.

We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.

The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.

See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.

What this library is — and isn't

This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,380 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (60.6% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.6%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.

1,032 records (3.8% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.

See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →

Newest studies, as a dated timeline →    Atom feed