Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

⚠ Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 16 out of 100. Clinical trials

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Eli Lilly's newer anti-amyloid antibody remternetug showed fast, dose-dependent removal of amyloid plaques in a small early trial: three-quarters of people getting the higher doses had their brain amyloid drop below the threshold used to call a scan 'positive' within about six months. Brain-swelling side effects (ARIA) occurred in about a quarter of participants, similar to other approved anti-amyloid drugs, with one symptomatic case.

Key findings

Why it matters

Eli Lilly's newer anti-amyloid antibody remternetug showed fast, dose-dependent removal of amyloid plaques in a small early trial: three-quarters of people getting the higher doses had their brain amyloid drop below the threshold used to call a scan 'positive' within about six months. Brain-swelling side effects (ARIA) occurred in about a quarter of participants, similar to other approved anti-amyloid drugs, with one symptomatic case.

Study details

Limitations

This is interim data from a small (n=41), unpublished phase 1 trial presented at a conference, not yet in a peer-reviewed journal; long-term efficacy on cognition/function has not been reported from this analysis. (Phase 1b randomized, placebo-controlled multiple-ascending-dose design.)

How this study scored 16/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 2 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 11 of 12; Strength of evidence 2 of 5; Peer-review validation 3 of 10; How recent 3 of 5; Sample size 1 of 4; Effect reported 2 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomised / blinded 1 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 0 of 2; Free to read left out, no data. 28 of the 66 points it could be judged on, which is 42 of 100. Raw total 42 of 100, shown as 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed research article.raw total 42 of 100capped at 16 — hatched points do not count

Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed. It scored 42 on the same rubric, but non-peer-reviewed sources are capped at 16, so it shows as 16. Scored zero for indexed in PubMed because the record does not state it. We have no data on times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multi-centre collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 28 of the 66 points we could judge it on, which is 42 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 2 / 10 Tier 4 — not a peer-reviewed journal (Presented at AD/PD 2023 Conference (Gothenburg, Sweden); covered by ALZFORUM and NeurologyLive)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Not a journal article, so the journal's record does not count
Study design 11 / 12 A randomised controlled trial
Strength of evidence 2 / 5 Rated “early” in our summary
Peer-review validation 3 / 10 Conference abstract — not peer-reviewed. Journal string identifies this as a conference abstract or presentation.
How recent 3 / 5 2023 — within 6 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 1 / 4 41 participants
Effect reported 2 / 3 Effect reported as a number, without an interval or test
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomised / blinded 1 / 2 Randomised (as stated in the record)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 0 / 2 No PubMed ID and no DOI — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Free to read — / 2 Access not recorded — left out of this score
Points 28 / 66 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 28 of the 66 points we could judge it on is 42 out of 100.
Total 42 / 100 Capped to 16 because this is not a peer-reviewed article.

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. This record has no DOI, so the citation leaves it out. The record's author field reads “Eli Lilly and Company (interim data presented at AD/PD 2023)”, which cannot be turned into a citation name, so it is left out. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Interim Phase 1 multiple ascending dose results for remternetug (LY3372993) in Alzheimer's disease. (2023). Presented at AD/PD 2023 Conference (Gothenburg, Sweden); covered by ALZFORUM and NeurologyLive.

Vancouver

Interim Phase 1 multiple ascending dose results for remternetug (LY3372993) in Alzheimer's disease. Presented at AD/PD 2023 Conference (Gothenburg, Sweden); covered by ALZFORUM and NeurologyLive. 2023.

BibTeX

@article{study2023-955fa2a8,
  title   = {{Interim Phase 1 multiple ascending dose results for remternetug (LY3372993) in Alzheimer's disease}},
  journal = {Presented at AD/PD 2023 Conference (Gothenburg, Sweden); covered by ALZFORUM and NeurologyLive},
  year    = {2023}
}

Related studies in Clinical trials

Similar studies

More on Clinical trials

See all studies in Clinical trials →