A total of 172 participants were randomized. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 172 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
The interventions proved effective in improving executive functions. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 112 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 325 participants enrolled and received study drug. 5 key findings →
Participants: 320 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
58/100
Of the total of 1795 subjects randomized in Clarity AD, 294 subjects were in the Asian region (Japan:152; Korea:129; Singapore:13). 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Participants: 294 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
If a substantial synergetic effect is detected, it may lead to the use of more widespread concurrent physical and cognitive training and the potential development of methods to make concurrent training practical. 4 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 126 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
PLWD also commonly experience social isolation (Shen et al., 2022), poorer physical function (Jehu et al., 2024a), worsened behavioral and psychological symptoms (Cerejeira et al., 2012), poorer quality of life (Cerejeira et al., 2012), and reduced access to healthcare (Mitchell et al., 2016) compared to older adults without dementia. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 21 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Less-invasive biomarkers for early Alzheimer disease (AD) are urgently needed. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 109 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Simufilam did not meet co-primary or secondary endpoints in these Phase 3 trials. 3 key findings →
Design: post-hoc analysis Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Our results support the positive cognitive effects of boswellic acids by reducing the systemic inflammation. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
As compared with placebo, semagacestat did not improve cognitive status, and patients receiving the higher dose had significant worsening of functional ability.
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In this real-life crossover study, THC/CBD oil did not show superiority over placebo in reducing agitation in severe dementia. 4 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 25 Evidence: null result
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Amyloid beta (Aβ) plaque is a defining pathologic feature of Alzheimer disease (AD). 5 key findings →
Design: case report Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
There is increasing evidence to suggest that physical activity has a protective effect on brain functioning in older people. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Our study compared the pain associated with 5- and 15-s subcutaneous injections of gantenerumab and evaluated the tolerability and pharmacokinetic properties of subcutaneous gantenerumab. 4 key findings →
Design: open-label trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Donepezil may effectively and safely improve overall functioning of DS patients with severe cognitive impairment. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Cerebrolysin (Cere) is a compound with neurotrophic activity. 3 key findings →
Participants: 192 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The Risk Evaluation and Education for Alzheimer Disease study provides an instructive example of a process to develop risk assessment protocols that are sensitive to the implications of genetic testing for multiple ethnic groups with differing levels of risk. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Little is known about the effectiveness of a psychosocial behaviour management programme on home-dwelling people with dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
We conducted a randomized, cross-over trial to investigate the feasibility, safety, and motor effects of brain stimulation with radio electric asymmetric conveyer (REAC) technique in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). 1 key finding →
Participants: 60 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
The intervention is oral simvastatin 40 mg at night for 12 months, versus placebo. 1 key finding →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
57/100
The recently published results of the 18-month randomized controlled trial of lecanemab, reporting the efficacy of the drug in slowing the progression of early Alzheimer disease, quickly led to approval by the FDA and widespread acceptance of lecanemab treatment. 4 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
With the moderate sample size of the current study, treatment using sodium benzoate, a DAO inhibitor, showed promise in improving cognition, especially short-term memory, in patients with aMCI. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This study revealed that 18 weeks of gum chewing with Olibanum did not change the neuropsychological status. 5 key findings →
Participants: 36 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This pilot trial aims to explore the feasibility of the trial, verify essential information of its efficacy and safety. 5 key findings →
Participants: 25 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Raloxifene at a dose of 120 mg/day, but not 60 mg/day, resulted in reduced risk of cognitive impairment in postmenopausal women. 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
From across this tag
10 of the 1,875 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
- Cognitive Training and Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Cognition in Parkinson's Disease: A Meta-analysis
- Ginkgo biloba and donepezil: a comparison in the treatment of Alzheimer's dementia in a randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study
- Uncovering lipid biomarkers linked to methylphenidate efficacy in treating apathy in Alzheimer's disease: insights from the ADMET 2 trial
- Donepezil delays progression to AD in MCI subjects with depressive symptoms
- Treatment of Restless Legs Syndrome Improves Agitation and Sleep in Persons with Dementia: A Randomized Trial
- Adherence and aerobic exercise intensity in live online exercise sessions for older adults with mild cognitive impairment: Insights from the Japan-Multimodal Intervention Trial for the Prevention of Dementia
- Effects of intermittent theta burst stimulation on cognitive and swallowing function in patients with MCI and dysphagia risk: a randomized controlled trial
- Monoclonal antibodies for treatment Alzheimer`s disease
- Association Between Lifestyle at Different Life Periods and Brain Integrity in Older Adults
- Biomarkers as Endpoints in Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →