14 studies were identified that matched inclusion criteria. 5 key findings →
Design: systematic review Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Research
28,180 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
This trial tested an antibody targeting tau tangles rather than amyloid plaques, in people with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's. It slowed decline on one cognitive test by 42% compared with placebo, the first time an anti-tau antibody showed any cognitive benefit, but it did not help with daily-function scores, overall dementia staging (CDR-SB), or the MMSE, and it did not reduce tangle buildup seen on tau brain scans. 5 key findings →
Design: phase-2-trial Participants: 272 Evidence: preliminary
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
This pilot randomized clinical trial demonstrated the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of LMH-4-DCP in reducing caregiver grief, with improvements in caregiver-care recipient relationship quality. 5 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 68 Evidence: preliminary
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
This study found that a high-intensity multidomain lifestyle intervention did not affect brain biomarker trajectories and was not associated with Aβ pathology, but older adults with specific at-risk brain characteristics, including lower baseline HC volume, showed a greater cognitive benefit of the structured intervention. 4 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 983 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among older adults with diabetes, no clear evidence was found that the incidence of dementia differed overall between patients using GLP-1RAs versus DPP4is. 4 key findings →
Design: cohort Participants: 7,254 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
65/100
PRT may have a small beneficial effect on cognitive function in SVCI. 5 key findings →
Design: RCT Participants: 91 Evidence: early
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Compared with non-users, SGLT-2i, GLP-1RA, TZD and metformin were associated with the reduced risk of dementia in patients with T2D. SGLT-2i, and GLP-1RA may serve as the optimal choice to improve the cognitive prognosis in patients with T2D. 5 key findings →
Design: meta-analysis Participants: 3,462,926 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
In DIAD, solanezumab was not associated with ARIA. 5 key findings →
Design: cross-sectional Participants: 52 Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Future research should examine whether minimizing drawbacks at the pre-imaging stage has adverse consequences on results disclosure. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 59 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The trial did not show efficacy of GbE, however, the lack of decline of the placebo patients may have compromised the sensitivity of the trial to detect a treatment effect. 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
This study is an extension of a 28-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of memantine in 252 patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer disease. 1 key finding →
Design: open-label trial Participants: 175 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
65/100
In this study, patients with Alzheimer dementia who took brexpiprazole, 2 or 3 mg, showed a statistically significant improvement vs placebo in agitation over 12 weeks. 3 key findings →
Participants: 228 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The mean (SD) age in the CA group was 72.2(7.5) years (range, 60-80 years), and in the placebo group it was 71.7 (7.4) years(range, 60-80 years). 3 key findings →
Participants: 261 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
All treatment groups showed improvement in measures of psychosis without significant differences between them when planned comparisons were performed. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Treatment also increased REM sleep duration and reduced ADAS-cog scores. 1 key finding →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
65/100
Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) often represents an early form of Alzheimer disease (AD). 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 28 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
65/100
Overall, 318 patients with AD completed BPST with an improvement of 5.6 points on the total Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI; mean [SD], 63.3 [16.0] to 57.7 [18.4], t = 4.8, df = 317, p 95% of patients. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 318 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We suggest that 6 months of dietary n-3 FA supplementation affected expression of genes that might influence inflammatory processes and could be of significance for AD. 3 key findings →
Participants: 16 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Cerebrovascular changes, including reduced cerebral blood flow (CBF), occur early in the development of Alzheimer disease and may accelerate disease progression. 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
In this randomized clinical trial, rotigotine treatment did not significantly affect global cognition in patients with mild to moderate AD; however, improvement was observed in cognitive functions highly associated with the frontal lobe and in activities of daily living. 5 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study Participants: 47 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The GuidAge study is the largest study carried out in Europe on the prevention of AD. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 2,854 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
Disclosure of pleiotropic information did not increase anxiety or depression and may have decreased distress among persons at increased risk for 2 conditions. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
65/100
After 3 months, IG improved gait speed (p = 0.016), implying a statistically significant difference between groups in favour of IG (p = 0.003). 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Participants: 31 Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Among 137 randomized participants, 2 were excluded for not meeting eligibility criteria, leaving 135 (mean [SD] age, 69.3 [3.8] years; 83 female [61%]) eligible for analysis. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Aerobic training significantly increased hippocampal volume in older women with probable MCI. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
From across this tag
10 of the 1,875 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
- The effects of an immersive virtual reality and telemedicine-based multi-component intervention in individuals with subjective cognitive decline: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
- Multidomain intervention for preventiing cognitive decline among older adults with mild cognitive impairment ‐ Interim results from TINAGE trial
- Safety and immunogenicity of the tau vaccine AADvac1 in patients with Alzheimer's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial
- Cost-effectiveness of donepezil in the treatment of mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease
- Behavioral treatment of depression in dementia patients: a controlled clinical trial
- Mild cognitive impairment: an opportunity to identify patients at high risk for progression to Alzheimer's disease
- A review of multidomain interventions to support healthy cognitive ageing
- Risks and benefits of unapproved disease-modifying treatments for neurodegenerative disease
- Aducanumab 36-month data from PRIME: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 1b study in patients with prodromal or mild Alzheimer’s disease (S2.004)
- Plant-Based Dietary Patterns, Plant Foods, and Age-Related Cognitive Decline
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 28,180 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 28,180 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.7% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.1%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →