70/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 70 out of 100.
·
Anesthesiology
·
2016-02-01
When compared with propofol, dexmedetomidine sedation reduced incidence, delayed onset, and shortened duration of POD in elderly patients after cardiac surgery. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
Cost-effective strategies to maintain healthy active lifestyle in aging populations are required to address the global burden of age-related diseases. 2 key findings →
Participants: 14,383
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Cybercycling older adults achieved better cognitive function than traditional exercisers, for the same effort, suggesting that simultaneous cognitive and physical exercise has greater potential for preventing cognitive decline. 4 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
This is the first randomized trial to investigate the impact of a ketogenic diet in patients with uniform diagnoses of AD. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Participants: 26
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Hormone replacement therapy increases cardiovascular and thromboembolic risk when started many years after the menopause. 5 key findings →
Participants: 2,196
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Scale of benefit is comparable with in-person training, indicating its potential as a public health intervention. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Participants: 2,912
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
70/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 70 out of 100.
·
BMJ
·
2025-05-27
Enrolment took place between March 2023 and May 2023. 3 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Participants: 4,533
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
69/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 69 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2010-05-05
Classification of evidence This study provides Class II evidence that specific dual-task training improves dual-task performance during walking under complex S3 conditions in geriatric patients with mild to moderate dementia. 3 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
Ageing of the population, together with population growth, has brought along an ample increase in the number of older individuals living with dementia and disabilities. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
69/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 69 out of 100.
·
Nature Medicine
·
2025-08-04
MPF (%WC, −2.06 (95% confidence interval (CI), −2.99, −1.13) and UPF (%WC, −1.05 (95% CI, −1.98, −0.13)) resulted in weight loss, with significantly greater %WC on MPF (Δ%WC, −1.01 (95% CI, −1.87, −0.14), P = 0.024; Cohen’s d , −0.48 (95% CI, −0.91, −0.06)). 2 key findings →
Participants: 55
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
This observational study analyzed electronic health records of about 1.09 million US patients with type 2 diabetes and found that those prescribed semaglutide (a GLP-1 diabetes/weight-loss drug) were substantially less likely to receive a first-time Alzheimer's diagnosis over 3 years than those on other diabetes medications. 3 key findings →
Design: cohort
Participants: 1,090,000
Evidence: preliminary
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
In elderly hypertensive patients, a slightly more effective blood pressure reduction during candesartan-based therapy, compared with control therapy, was associated with a modest, statistically non-significant, reduction in major cardiovascular events and with a marked reduction in non-fatal stroke. 4 key findings →
Design: open-label trial
Participants: 4,964
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
68/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 68 out of 100.
·
CNS drugs
·
2015-02-01
In the seven longitudinal studies assessing the effect of antihypertensive medication on cognitive impairment or cognitive decline, antihypertensive drugs appeared to be beneficial. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review
Participants: 1,346,176
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
68/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 68 out of 100.
·
BMC medicine
·
2014-04-15
Pre- and postoperative orthogeriatric care given in an acute geriatric ward was not effective in reducing delirium or long-term cognitive impairment in patients with hip fracture. 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Participants: 329
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Among 12,327 patients who underwent randomization (6162 to the asundexian group and 6165 to the placebo group), the incidence of ischemic stroke was lower in the asundexian group than in the placebo group (6.2% vs. 8.4%; cause-specific hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.84; P<0.001). 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial
Participants: 12,327
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
A nutritional approach could be a promising strategy to prevent or slow the progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's disease, since there is no effective therapy for these diseases so far. 4 key findings →
Design: systematic review
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
APPLE-Tree is an accessible intervention associated with small improvements in cognition, although these results were not statistically significant. 1 key finding →
Design: RCT
Participants: 746
Evidence: null result
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Although no overall EF benefit was observed, RE improved attentional/inhibitory control in cognitively normal older adults. 4 key findings →
Design: RCT
Participants: 90
Evidence: null result
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
A total of 172 patients were included (86 each in the sotatercept and placebo groups). 5 key findings →
Design: clinical trial
Participants: 172
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
66/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100.
·
Neurology
·
2025-06-27
Among eligible participants (n = 705,061), 264,294 individuals (37.5% of eligible participants) initiated any statin during 2001-2010 ("initiators"), of whom 249,613 (94.4%) were matched with 255,937 unique noninitiators to create the analytic sample (322,358 unique participants; mean age at baseline = 67.4 years; 55.1% female). 3 key findings →
Design: cohort
Participants: 322,358
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Cognitive exercise training in healthy older individuals produces strong and persistent protective effects on longitudinal neuropsychological performance. 3 key findings →
Design: longitudinal study
Participants: 54
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
Depressive symptoms may increase the risk of progressing from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to dementia. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
Whether the cognitive benefits of physical exercise can improve the overall well-being of this group remains unknown. 2 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Participants: 120
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Full text may need a subscription
66/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 66 out of 100.
·
Age and Ageing
·
2025-01-01
From October 2018 to March 2020, 58 participants were recruited (29 per group, 95% [86%-99%]). 5 key findings →
Design: randomized controlled trial
Participants: 58
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
65/100
✓ Peer-reviewed
alzhub usefulness score 65 out of 100.
·
JAMA Neurology
·
2026-06-01
This study found that a high-intensity multidomain lifestyle intervention did not affect brain biomarker trajectories and was not associated with Aβ pathology, but older adults with specific at-risk brain characteristics, including lower baseline HC volume, showed a greater cognitive benefit of the structured intervention. 4 key findings →
Design: RCT
Participants: 983
Evidence: moderate
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies →
Original source
Free full text
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor,
and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a
scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the
difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself,
so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomized / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multicenter collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we
could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be
worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science,
Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed
journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the
tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a
missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores
zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and
the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed
article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or
a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not
work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by
that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is
reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out →
— four charts covering all 31,380 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap
bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on
stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.