The ANCOVA demonstrated no significant overall differences in BPSD severity related to SES measures. 5 key findings →
Participants: 144 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Research
27,780 Alzheimer's and dementia studies in plain English, each scored out of 100.
Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) are progressive neurodegenerative conditions that impair memory, thought processes, and functioning. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
We identified two main themes (each with subthemes) that influence Latino dementia caregiver experiences with healthcare: (1) caregiving and understanding of dementia shaped by individual, family, and social factors (subthemes: Caregiver's own understanding of dementia; Lack of support and understanding from family; Latino cultural perspectives on dementia); and (2) navigating formal services amid gaps in cultural alignment and support (subthemes: Trial and error: education and resource gaps; Cultural tension with healthcare). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Spousal caregivers of persons living with dementia (PLwD) often experience high overload and loneliness due to the intensive and ongoing nature of caregiving for their partner. 3 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Informal caregivers of patients with neurodegenerative diseases are confronted with significant psychological distress. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Adults of 78.8 years on average, with low to middle socio-economic status, low education levels, and multiple comorbidities, have adverse well-being and support conditions, except for the spiritual component. 5 key findings →
Participants: 73 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The CES effectively distinguished between different levels of caregiver strain. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Assistive technologies hold significant potential to enhance the quality of life for persons with dementia and their caregivers by addressing key concerns related to safety, independence, and social inclusion. 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
A total of 11 dyads participated in the study. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
The findings revealed three core areas: (a) types of digital tools used, including online platforms, video conferencing, mobile applications and SMS services; (b) educational domains addressed, such as knowledge and skills, psychological support, communication and social interaction, and environmental and technological adaptation; and (c) implementation strategies and outcomes, highlighting personalisation, cultural sensitivity and technological adaptability, which improved knowledge, emotional well-being and carer self-efficacy. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia disproportionately affects Hispanic/Latino caregivers, and while some interventions exist, their consideration of intersectional factors remains unclear. 1 key finding →
Participants: 41 Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Dementia is a growing challenge in Southeastern and Western Europe, with aging trends projected to accelerate in the former region. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
39/100
At baseline, the mean ZBI score was 24.5 ± 15.2 and correlated positively with caregiver CES-D and STAI scores and with patient neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPI-frequency × severity) and distress felt by the caregiver (NPI-distress). 4 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
BackgroundEvidence on the effects of caregiver-assisted combined exercise and cognitive interventions for persons with dementia (PwD) is inconsistent. 2 key findings →
Evidence: high
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Full text may need a subscription
End-of-life topics were discussed in 36% of consultations (in regional hospitals, 53%; in academic settings, 27%), and predominantly during diagnostic consultations (54%). 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source Free full text
Caregivers of individuals with dementia are at risk for chronic stress and social isolation. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Over the past two decades, caregiver stress has been the subject of scientific inquiry by investigators around the world representing a variety of disciplines. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Liu et al. (2017) investigated caregiver burden of patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), which was compared with caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The concept of personhood developed by Tom Kitwood highlights that the experience of dementia has relational dimensions that transcend the neurodegenerative impacts of the condition. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Perceived burden was directly and significantly related to depression for both spouse caregivers and adult child caregivers. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Content analysis of the video-recorded group interactions yielded recurrent themes of caregivers' spiritual reflections and their associations with managing caregiver stress responses. 2 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Post-diagnostic care in young-onset dementia (YoD) varies, from something that is occasionally structured, to improvised, to frequently non-existent depending on geographic region. 5 key findings →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Phases 1 and 2 results facilitated targeted changes in BESI, thus improving its overall usability for the final phase of the study, when real-time notifications and interventions will be implemented. 2 key findings →
Design: clinical trial Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
The purpose of this study was to identify family caregivers' experiences in managing the behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) with particular focus on their interpersonal interactions with patient with dementia. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
Using qualitative interviews, this research explores the experiences of residential nursing home caregivers in Fukushima, who provided support to elderly sufferers of Alzheimer's or other related forms of dementia during the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. 1 key finding →
Evidence: low
Full summary, score breakdown and related studies → Original source
From across this tag
10 of the 893 studies in this tag, picked by a fixed rule (a hash of each study's address), not by score or date; each page of this list shows a different 10. The same 10 appear here every time.
- Mapping Caregiver Needs to AI Chatbot Design: Strengths and Gaps in Mental Health Support for Alzheimer's and Dementia Caregivers
- Impact of early onset dementia on caregivers: a review
- Grocery lists: connecting family, household and grocery store
- Systematic review of information and support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia
- Translating the REACH OUT dementia caregiver intervention into a primary care setting: a pilot study
- Are family carers part of the care team providing end-of-life care? A qualitative interview study on the collaboration between family and professional carers
- Exploring the unmet needs of Latino dementia caregivers: a qualitative study
- Medicare expenditures among spouses of persons with dementia
- Co-design, Cultural Adaptation, and Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Carer Support Program for Chinese Australian Dementia Carers
- Stress, appraisal, coping, and social support as predictors of adaptational outcome among dementia caregivers
Where “Free full text” comes from
Free full text links and the Full text may need a subscription label come from Unpaywall, Europe PMC and OpenAlex records of free copies, checked 10 Oct 2026. A study with neither is unknown, not paywalled. Show only studies that are free to read
How the 0–100 score works — and why some entries are capped
This is alzhub's own score. It is not an official metric, not an impact factor, and no journal, publisher or ranking body endorses it. We built it so that a reader who is not a scientist can tell a landmark trial from a conference abstract without having to already know the difference. Every point comes from one of 20 components, all of them printed on the study itself, so you can disagree with our arithmetic rather than having to trust the total.
- Journal tier up to 10 pts
- Journal's citation record up to 4 pts
- Study design up to 12 pts
- Strength of evidence up to 5 pts
- Peer-review validation up to 10 pts
- How recent up to 5 pts
- Sample size up to 4 pts
- Effect reported up to 3 pts
- Studied in people up to 3 pts
- Randomised / blinded up to 2 pts
- Times cited up to 7 pts
- Citations per year up to 5 pts
- Impact for its field and year up to 6 pts
- Cited by studies here up to 6 pts
- Still being cited up to 4 pts
- Senior author's track record up to 4 pts
- Institution's track record up to 3 pts
- Multi-centre collaboration up to 3 pts
- Indexed in PubMed up to 2 pts
- Free to read up to 2 pts
Journals are placed in ordered tiers, never given a numeric impact factor — we could not verify current impact factors from a source we control, and an invented one would be worse than none. Tier 1 is the top-tier general journals (NEJM, The Lancet, JAMA, Nature, Science, Nature Medicine); tier 2 is the leading specialty journals; tier 3 is every other peer-reviewed journal. A separate part scores how much the journal's own papers are cited, which tells the tier-3 journals apart.
Two rules we don't bend. First, we never fill in a missing value: if a record does not state a sample size or a design, that component scores zero, and if we simply have no data for a part, such as a citation count, that part is left out and the study is scored on the parts we could check. The study card says which. Second, anything that is not a peer-reviewed article is capped at 16/100 and carries a warning chip — so a conference abstract or a company press release can never outrank a peer-reviewed paper, no matter how good it looks.
We rank a rigorous null result — a good trial showing that something does not work — above an early positive finding. Someone deciding whether to buy a supplement is served by that, and the rigour is already counted by the design and journal components.
The score is computed from the published data alone and is reproducible: the same file always yields the same numbers.
See the whole rubric drawn out → — four charts covering all 27,780 studies: how the scores are spread and where the cap bites, which of the 20 components the library is strong and weak on, which subjects rest on stronger evidence, and what kinds of study each subject is actually built from.
What this library is — and isn't
This is a large sample of the Alzheimer's literature, not an exhaustive index of it. It holds 27,780 records, built mostly from automated pulls of Europe PMC (61.1% of the library) and OpenAlex (18.3%), plus smaller pulls from PubMed, Crossref and medRxiv. If a study, a drug, or a finding isn't here, that is not evidence it doesn't exist in the literature — it may simply not have been pulled in yet.
1,034 records (3.7% of the library) are not peer-reviewed — 962 of those are preprints posted before any journal review, and the rest are conference abstracts, regulatory notices and reports. Every study card on this page states its status plainly, and the score above is capped for anything that isn't a peer-reviewed article.
See the full, machine-readable breakdown of this library's coverage →