Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 48 out of 100. Risk factors

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Plain-language summary

Genome-wide association studies have led to numerous genetic loci associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) now permit genome-wide analyses to identify rare variants contributing to AD risk. We performed single-variant and spatial clustering-based testing on rare variants (minor allele frequency ≤1%) in a family-based WGS-based association study of 2,247 subjects from 605 multiplex AD families, followed by replication in 1,669 unrelated individuals. We identified 13 new AD candidate loci that yielded consistent rare-variant signals in discovery and replication cohorts (4 from single-variant, 9 from spatial-clustering), implicating these genes: FNBP1L, SEL1L, LINC00298, PRKCH, C15ORF41, C2CD3, KIF2A, APC, LHX9, NALCN, CTNNA2, SYTL3, CLSTN2. Downstream analyses of these novel loci highlight synaptic function, in contrast to common AD-associated variants, which implicate innate immunity. These loci have not been previously associated with AD, emphasizing the ability of WGS to identify AD-associated rare variants, particularly outside of coding regions.

What this study adds

Evidence grade: Low

The record lists 2,247 participants. Using whole-genome sequencing in families with multiple Alzheimer's cases, this study identified 13 new candidate genes, many related to synaptic function. These are genetic associations that may guide future research, not a treatment or cure.

Taken from this record’s own fields, not from reading the paper. The grade is assigned from the abstract’s wording; what that means.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

APA 7th

Dmitry, P., Morgan Sarah, L., Kristina, M., Oliver, H., Brad, C., Rory, K., et al. (2020). Whole-genome sequencing reveals new Alzheimer's disease-associated rare variants in loci related to synaptic function and neuronal development. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.03.20225540

Vancouver

Dmitry P, Morgan Sarah L, Kristina M, Oliver H, Brad C, Rory K, et al. Whole-genome sequencing reveals new Alzheimer's disease-associated rare variants in loci related to synaptic function and neuronal development. Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. 2020. doi:10.1101/2020.11.03.20225540. PMID: 33173892.

BibTeX

@article{dmitry2020-33173892,
  author  = {Dmitry, Prokopenko and Morgan Sarah, L. and Kristina, Mullin and Oliver, Hofmann and Brad, Chapman and Rory, Kirchner and Sandeep, Amberkar and Inken, Wohlers and others},
  title   = {{Whole-genome sequencing reveals new Alzheimer's disease-associated rare variants in loci related to synaptic function and neuronal development}},
  journal = {Alzheimer's \& dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association},
  year    = {2020},
  doi     = {10.1101/2020.11.03.20225540},
  pmid    = {33173892},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.03.20225540}
}

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

Key findings

Why it matters

Using whole-genome sequencing in families with multiple Alzheimer's cases, this study identified 13 new candidate genes, many related to synaptic function. These are genetic associations that may guide future research, not a treatment or cure.

Study details

How this study scored 48/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 9 of 10; Journal's citation record left out, no data; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 2 of 5; Sample size 3 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 3 of 3; Randomized / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited left out, no data; Citations per year left out, no data; Impact for its field and year left out, no data; Cited by studies here 1 of 6; Still being cited left out, no data; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multicenter collaboration left out, no data; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. 31 of the 64 points it could be judged on, which is 48 of 100. Total 48 of 100.31 of the 64 points we could judge = 48 of 100

Published in a leading specialty journal. Scored zero for study design, effect reported and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multicenter collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 31 of the 64 points we could judge it on, which is 48 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 9 / 10 Tier 2 — leading specialty journal (Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association)
Journal's citation record — / 4 No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 2 / 5 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 3 / 4 2,247 participants
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 3 / 3 Studied in people (participant count stated)
Randomized / blinded 0 / 2 No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited — / 7 No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score
Citations per year — / 5 No citation count or no year — left out of this score
Impact for its field and year — / 6 No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score
Cited by studies here 1 / 6 Cited by 2 other studies in this library
Still being cited — / 4 No yearly citation counts — left out of this score
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multicenter collaboration — / 3 Institutions not listed — left out of this score
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 33797837)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Points 31 / 64 Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 31 of the 64 points we could judge it on is 48 out of 100.
Total 48 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.

Studies this one cites

Referenced by this study and also in the alzhub library, so you can read them here.

Later studies that cite this one

2 studies in the alzhub library list this one in their references.

Related studies in Risk factors from nearby years

Also tagged “precursor”

1,337 studies in the library carry the topic tag “precursor”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,337 tagged studies.

Studies sharing this one's topic tags

Similar studies

More on Risk factors

See all studies in Risk factors →