Home › Research › Prevention trials
What is the effectiveness of cognitive training in preventing cognitive decline in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease?
Tripdatabase. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2026-05-06
Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies
Cognitive training shows potential in preventing cognitive decline in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease, especially as part of multimodal interventions, though current evidence varies in quality and clarity.
Key findings
- Cognitive training shows potential in preventing cognitive decline in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease, especially as part of multimodal interventions, though current evidence varies in quality and clarity.
Why it matters
This review reports that cognitive training shows potential in preventing cognitive decline in people at risk for Alzheimer's disease, especially as part of multimodal interventions. However, it states that current evidence varies in quality and clarity, so no firm conclusion about prevention can be drawn.
New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Prevention →
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 41/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record and multi-centre collaboration, so those were left out: it earned 26 of the 64 points we could judge it on, which is 41 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 5 / 5 | 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multi-centre collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 1 / 2 | Not in PubMed, but has a DOI |
| Free to read | 2 / 2 | Free to read |
| Points | 26 / 64 | Scored on 12 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 26 of the 64 points we could judge it on is 41 out of 100. |
| Total | 41 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Tripdatabase. (2026). What is the effectiveness of cognitive training in preventing cognitive decline in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease? Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20753244
Vancouver
Tripdatabase. What is the effectiveness of cognitive training in preventing cognitive decline in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease? Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 2026. doi:10.5281/zenodo.20753244.
BibTeX
@article{tripdatabase2026-181ddcbe,
author = {Tripdatabase},
title = {{What is the effectiveness of cognitive training in preventing cognitive decline in individuals at risk for Alzheimer's disease?}},
journal = {Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.20753244},
url = {https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20753244}
}
Related studies in Prevention trials
Also tagged “cognitive-function”
1,118 studies in the library carry the topic tag “cognitive-function”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 1,118 tagged studies.