Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records

Topic: Health services, long-term care and technology

Purpose The Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) is Canada's first national chronic disease surveillance system based on electronic health record (EHR) data. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate case definitions and case-finding algorithms used to identify 8 common chronic conditions in primary care: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), dementia, depression, diabetes, hypertension, osteoarthritis, parkinsonism, and epilepsy. Methods Using a cross-sectional data validation study design, regional and local CPCSSN networks from British Columbia, Alberta (2), Ontario, Nova Scotia, and Newfoundland participated in validating EHR case-finding algorithms. A random sample of EHR charts were reviewed, oversampling for patients older than 60 years and for those with epilepsy or parkinsonism. Charts were reviewed by trained research assistants and residents who were blinded to the algorithmic diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPVs, NPVs) were calculated. Results We obtained data from 1,920 charts from 4 different EHR systems (Wolf, Med Access, Nightingale, and PS Suite). For the total sample, sensitivity ranged from 78% (osteoarthritis) to more than 95% (diabetes, epilepsy, and parkinsonism); specificity was greater than 94% for all diseases; PPV ranged from 72% (dementia) to 93% (hypertension); NPV ranged from 86% (hypertension) to greater than 99% (diabetes, dementia, epilepsy, and parkinsonism). Conclusions The CPCSSN diagnostic algorithms showed excellent sensitivity and specificity for hypertension, diabetes, epilepsy, and parkinsonism and acceptable values for the other conditions. CPCSSN data are appropriate for use in public health surveillance, primary care, and health services research, as well as to inform policy for these diseases.

Key findings

• Results We obtained data from 1,920 charts from 4 different EHR systems (Wolf, Med Access, Nightingale, and PS Suite).

New to this subject? Start with our plain-English guide: Digital health →

Study details

• Study designcross-sectional
• Evidence strengthLow

Read the original

• DOI: 10.1370/afm.1644
• PubMed: 25024246
• Original source →

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

@article{williamson2014-25024246,
  author  = {Williamson, T. and Green, M. E. and Birtwhistle, R. and Khan, S. and Garies, S. and Wong, S. T. and Natarajan, N. and Manca, D. and others},
  title   = {{Validating the 8 CPCSSN case definitions for chronic disease surveillance in a primary care database of electronic health records}},
  journal = {Annals of family medicine},
  year    = {2014},
  doi     = {10.1370/afm.1644},
  pmid    = {25024246},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1644}
}

Related studies in Digital health tools

• PheMap: a multi-resource knowledge base for high-throughput phenotyping within electronic health records Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020-11-01 · usefulness score 64/100
• The validity of dementia diagnoses in routinely collected electronic health records in the United Kingdom: A systematic review Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2019-01-22 · usefulness score 62/100
• Data-driven discovery of probable Alzheimer's disease and related dementia subphenotypes using electronic health records Learning health systems · 2020-09-10 · usefulness score 58/100
• Deep representation learning of electronic health records to unlock patient stratification at scale NPJ digital medicine · 2020-07-17 · usefulness score 57/100
• Multiple morbidity across the lifespan in people with Down syndrome or intellectual disabilities: a population-based cohort study using electronic health records The Lancet. Public health · 2023-04-26 · usefulness score 55/100
• Detection of probable dementia cases in undiagnosed patients using structured and unstructured electronic health records BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019-07-09 · usefulness score 53/100

Similar studies

• Identification of Physician-Diagnosed Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in Population-Based Administrative Data: A Validation Study Using Family Physicians' Electronic Medical Records 2016 · Digital health tools
• Quebec Integrated Chronic Disease Surveillance System (QICDSS), an innovative approach 2014 · Digital health tools
• Combining billing codes, clinical notes, and medications from electronic health records provides superior phenotyping performance 2016 · Digital health tools
• Development and Validation of eRADAR: A Tool Using EHR Data to Detect Unrecognized Dementia 2020 · Digital health tools
• Stratifying risk for dementia onset using large-scale electronic health record data: A retrospective cohort study 2020 · Digital health tools
• Accuracy of administrative data to assess comorbidity in patients with heart disease. an Australian perspective 2001 · Digital health tools

More on Digital health tools

• A review that covers this ground Developing indicators of appropriate and inappropriate end-of-life care in people with Alzheimer's disease, cancer or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease for population-level administrative databases: A RAND/UCLA appropriateness study Palliative medicine · 2017-04-21 · usefulness score 38/100
• Newest in this subject Speaker-Wise Dementia Screening fromNaturalistic Speech with Lexical Entropy, Semantic Drift, and Multimodal Fusion Research Square · 2026-10-21 · Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed · usefulness score 16/100
• Newest in this subject Integrating Multisource Target Evidence with Machine-Learning Potency Prediction for Alzheimer’s Disease Drug Discovery bioRxiv · 2026-10-20 · Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed · usefulness score 16/100

See all studies in Digital health tools →