Home › Research › Vascular contributions
Understanding the Pathophysiology of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy
Laura Gatti, Francesca Tinelli, Emma Scelzo, Francesco Arioli, Giuseppe Di Fede, Laura Obici, Leonardo Pantoni, Giorgio Giaccone et al.. International journal of molecular sciences, 2020-05-13
Topic: Inflammation, microglia and astrocytes
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), one of the main types of cerebral small vessel disease, is a major cause of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage and an important contributor to cognitive decline in elderly patients. Despite the number of experimental in vitro studies and animal models, the pathophysiology of CAA is still largely unknown. Although several pathogenic mechanisms including an unbalance between production and clearance of amyloid beta (Aβ) protein as well as 'the prion hypothesis' have been invoked as possible disease triggers, they do not explain completely the disease pathogenesis. This incomplete disease knowledge limits the implementation of treatments able to prevent or halt the clinical progression. The continuous increase of CAA patients makes imperative the development of suitable experimental in vitro or animal models to identify disease biomarkers and new pharmacological treatments that could be administered in the early disease stages to prevent irreversible changes and disease progression.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
APA 7th
Gatti, L., Tinelli, F., Scelzo, E., Arioli, F., Di Fede, G., Obici, L., et al. (2020). Understanding the Pathophysiology of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy. International journal of molecular sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103435
Vancouver
Gatti L, Tinelli F, Scelzo E, Arioli F, Di Fede G, Obici L, et al. Understanding the Pathophysiology of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy. International journal of molecular sciences. 2020. doi:10.3390/ijms21103435. PMID: 32414028.
BibTeX
@article{gatti2020-32414028,
author = {Gatti, Laura and Tinelli, Francesca and Scelzo, Emma and Arioli, Francesco and Di Fede, Giuseppe and Obici, Laura and Pantoni, Leonardo and Giaccone, Giorgio and others},
title = {{Understanding the Pathophysiology of Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy}},
journal = {International journal of molecular sciences},
year = {2020},
doi = {10.3390/ijms21103435},
pmid = {32414028},
url = {https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21103435}
}
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record's author list ends in “et al.”, so not every author is named. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
Key findings
- Cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), one of the main types of cerebral small vessel disease, is a major cause of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage and an important contributor to cognitive decline in elderly patients.
- Despite the number of experimental in vitro studies and animal models, the pathophysiology of CAA is still largely unknown.
- Although several pathogenic mechanisms including an unbalance between production and clearance of amyloid beta (Aβ) protein as well as 'the prion hypothesis' have been invoked as possible disease triggers, they do not explain completely the disease pathogenesis.
- This incomplete disease knowledge limits the implementation of treatments able to prevent or halt the clinical progression.
- The continuous increase of CAA patients makes imperative the development of suitable experimental in vitro or animal models to identify disease biomarkers and new pharmacological treatments that could be administered in the early disease stages to prevent irreversible changes and disease progression.
Study details
- Evidence strengthLow
How this study scored 39/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomized / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on journal's citation record, times cited, citations per year, impact for its field and year, cited by studies here, still being cited, senior author's track record, institution's track record, multicenter collaboration and free to read, so those were left out: it earned 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on, which is 39 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (International journal of molecular sciences) |
| Journal's citation record | — / 4 | No journal record from OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | 1 / 5 | Rated “low” in our summary |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 2 / 5 | 2020 — within 10 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomized / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomization or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | — / 7 | No citation count (not found in OpenAlex) — left out of this score |
| Citations per year | — / 5 | No citation count or no year — left out of this score |
| Impact for its field and year | — / 6 | No field-weighted citation impact (OpenAlex has none yet) — left out of this score |
| Cited by studies here | — / 6 | Not yet checked against this library's citation graph — left out of this score |
| Still being cited | — / 4 | No yearly citation counts — left out of this score |
| Senior author's track record | — / 4 | Senior author's record not available — left out of this score |
| Institution's track record | — / 3 | No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score |
| Multicenter collaboration | — / 3 | Institutions not listed — left out of this score |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 32414028) |
| Free to read | — / 2 | Access not recorded — left out of this score |
| Points | 22 / 56 | Scored on 10 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 22 of the 56 points we could judge it on is 39 out of 100. |
| Total | 39 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.
Related
Studies in the library that share something with this one. The line above each title says what.
Related studies in Vascular contributions
Also tagged “amyloid-angiopathy”
228 studies in the library carry the topic tag “amyloid-angiopathy”; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed, alphabetical-by-hash tour of them, not the closest in content. All 228 tagged studies.