Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 27 out of 100. Risk genes beyond APOE

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a neurological condition that worsens over time and is characterised by tau tangles and amyloid plaques. Current medications mostly address symptoms, despite significant research advancement, leaving a demand for disease-modifying therapy unfulfilled. New treatment approaches target the genetic and molecular causes of AD by focussing on gene editing, specifically the CRISPR-Cas9 system. By specifically editing genes linked to disease, including APP, PSEN1, PSEN2, and APOE4, CRISPR-Cas9 aims to improve neuronal protection and lessen tau and amyloid-beta pathology. Base and prime editing are two recent developments in CRISPR technology that have increased therapeutic potential, decreased off-target effects, and improved editing specificity. In cellular and animal models, preclinical research shows that it is effective in repairing mutations, modifying gene expression, and lowering the synthesis of neurotoxic proteins. Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) and lipid nanoparticles are two delivery systems that have been created to get across the blood-brain barrier's obstacles. Clinical use is nevertheless hampered by concerns about long-term safety, distribution efficiency, and ethical issues, despite encouraging results. CRISPR-Cas9's combination with immunotherapy and artificial intelligence has created new opportunities for precision medicine by providing specialised methods to address the pathological and genetic characteristics of AD. With its potential to shift AD treatment from symptomatic management to curative approaches, this review focusses on the advancements, difficulties, and prospects of CRISPR-Cas9 in AD therapies. To advance CRISPR-based medicines into clinical practice, ongoing innovation in gene-editing technologies, delivery methods, and ethical frameworks will be essential

Key findings

Why it matters

This review discusses CRISPR-Cas9 and newer editing approaches targeting genes such as APP, PSEN1, PSEN2 and APOE4, with preclinical evidence in cellular and animal models. It notes that clinical use is hampered by concerns about long-term safety, delivery efficiency and ethical issues, so no treatment or cure is yet established.

Study details

How this study scored 27/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 4 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record left out, no data; Institution's track record left out, no data; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 1 of 2; Free to read 2 of 2. 25 of the 93 points it could be judged on, which is 27 of 100. Total 27 of 100.25 of the 93 points we could judge = 27 of 100

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on senior author's track record and institution's track record, so those were left out: it earned 25 of the 93 points we could judge it on, which is 27 out of 100.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis: journal h-index 10 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 4 / 5 2025 — within 3 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 3 year(s) since 2025
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record — / 4 Senior author's record not available — left out of this score
Institution's track record — / 3 No institution listed in OpenAlex — left out of this score
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 0 institution(s) in 0 countries — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 1 / 2 Not in PubMed, but has a DOI
Free to read 2 / 2 Free to read
Points 25 / 93 Scored on 18 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 25 of the 93 points we could judge it on is 27 out of 100.
Total 27 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Full text: free to read — OpenAlex lists this copy as free to read: the link above (checked 6 Feb 1020).

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Bhatia, V. (2025). "Transformative Approaches to Alzheimer Disease Treatment: Current Progress and Future Direction”. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis. https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v32.5141

Vancouver

Bhatia V. "Transformative Approaches to Alzheimer Disease Treatment: Current Progress and Future Direction”. Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis. 2025. doi:10.52783/cana.v32.5141.

BibTeX

@article{bhatia2025-b059f7db,
  author  = {Bhatia, Vandana},
  title   = {{"Transformative Approaches to Alzheimer Disease Treatment: Current Progress and Future Direction”}},
  journal = {Communications on Applied Nonlinear Analysis},
  year    = {2025},
  doi     = {10.52783/cana.v32.5141},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.52783/cana.v32.5141}
}

Related studies in Risk genes beyond APOE

Also in Risk genes beyond APOE

98 studies in the library are filed under Risk genes beyond APOE with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Risk genes beyond APOE hub.

Similar studies

More on Risk genes beyond APOE

See all studies in Risk genes beyond APOE →