Home › Research › Long-term cohort studies
The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Database: The Uniform Data Set
Duane L. Beekly, Erin M. Ramos, William W. Lee, Woodrow D. Deitrich, Mary E. Jacka, Joylee Wu, Janene L. Hubbard, Thomas D. Koepsell, John C. Morris, Walter A. Kukull. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 2007-07-01
Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis
The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) is responsible for developing and maintaining a database of participant information collected from the 29 Alzheimer's Disease Centers (ADCs) funded by the National Institute on Aging (NIA). The NIA appointed the ADC Clinical Task Force to determine and define an expanded, standardized clinical data set, called the Uniform Data Set (UDS). The goal of the UDS is to provide ADC researchers a standard set of assessment procedures, collected longitudinally, to better characterize ADC participants with mild Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment in comparison with nondemented controls. NACC implemented the UDS (September 2005) by developing data collection forms for initial and follow-up visits based on Clinical Task Force definitions, a relational database, and a data submission system accessible by all ADCs. The NIA requires ADCs to submit UDS data to NACC for all their Clinical Core participants. Thus, the NACC web site (https://www.alz.washington.edu) was enhanced to provide efficient and secure access data submission and retrieval systems.
Why it matters
Describes the Uniform Data Set, a standard set of assessments collected over time from participants at the 29 Alzheimer's Disease Centers funded by the National Institute on Aging. It is meant to help compare people with mild Alzheimer's and mild cognitive impairment with people without dementia.
How this study scored 48/100
Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it. We have no data on strength of evidence, so that was left out: it earned 46 of the 95 points we could judge it on, which is 48 out of 100.
| Component | Points | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Journal tier | 7 / 10 | Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders) |
| Journal's citation record | 1 / 4 | Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders: journal h-index 131 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29) |
| Study design | 0 / 12 | No study design recorded — scores zero, not guessed (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Strength of evidence | — / 5 | No evidence rating recorded — left out of this score |
| Peer-review validation | 10 / 10 | Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal. |
| How recent | 1 / 5 | 2007 — within 20 year(s) of the newest study here |
| Sample size | 0 / 4 | Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Effect reported | 0 / 3 | No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Studied in people | 0 / 3 | Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Randomised / blinded | 0 / 2 | No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0) |
| Times cited | 6 / 7 | Cited 915 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-10) |
| Citations per year | 4 / 5 | 43.6 citations a year over 21 year(s) since 2007 |
| Impact for its field and year | 3 / 6 | Cited 4.6× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI) |
| Cited by studies here | 0 / 6 | No other study in this library cites it |
| Still being cited | 4 / 4 | Cited 355 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex) |
| Senior author's track record | 4 / 4 | Last-listed author Walter A. Kukull: h-index 107 (OpenAlex, whole career) |
| Institution's track record | 3 / 3 | University of Washington: institution h-index 3,540 (OpenAlex) |
| Multi-centre collaboration | 1 / 3 | OpenAlex lists 3 institution(s) in 1 country |
| Indexed in PubMed | 2 / 2 | Indexed in PubMed (PMID 17804958) |
| Free to read | 0 / 2 | Behind a paywall — scores zero |
| Points | 46 / 95 | Scored on 19 of 20 parts. We have no data for the rest, so they are left out: 46 of the 95 points we could judge it on is 48 out of 100. |
| Total | 48 / 100 | — |
What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →
Read the original
May need a subscription OpenAlex found no free copy of the full text (checked 6 Feb 1020), so the publisher may charge for it. The PubMed abstract is free.
Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris
Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. The record names 10 authors; APA and Vancouver show the first six, BibTeX and the downloads carry all of them. Check the citation against the original before you use it.
APA 7th
Beekly, D. L., Ramos, E. M., Lee, W. W., Deitrich, W. D., Jacka, M. E., Wu, J., et al. (2007). The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Database: The Uniform Data Set. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1097/wad.0b013e318142774e
Vancouver
Beekly DL, Ramos EM, Lee WW, Deitrich WD, Jacka ME, Wu J, et al. The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Database: The Uniform Data Set. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders. 2007. doi:10.1097/wad.0b013e318142774e. PMID: 17804958.
BibTeX
@article{beekly2007-17804958,
author = {Beekly, Duane L. and Ramos, Erin M. and Lee, William W. and Deitrich, Woodrow D. and Jacka, Mary E. and Wu, Joylee and Hubbard, Janene L. and Koepsell, Thomas D. and Morris, John C. and Kukull, Walter A.},
title = {{The National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) Database: The Uniform Data Set}},
journal = {Alzheimer Disease \& Associated Disorders},
year = {2007},
doi = {10.1097/wad.0b013e318142774e},
pmid = {17804958},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1097/wad.0b013e318142774e}
}
Related studies in Long-term cohort studies
Also in Long-term cohort studies
54 studies in the library are filed under Long-term cohort studies with no topic tag they share with another; these are this study's neighbours in a fixed tour of them. The Long-term cohort studies hub.