Get help now — free helplines

You can call any of these for free. You do not need a diagnosis, an appointment, or a crisis to call — questions and plain exhaustion are reasons enough.

  • Alzheimer's Association 24/7 Helpline 800-272-3900 24 hours a day, 365 days a year Free, confidential support and information for people with dementia, caregivers, families and the public. Master's-level clinicians. Also Spanish.
  • 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline 988 24/7 Call or text 988, or chat at 988lifeline.org. For anyone in emotional distress or a mental-health crisis, including caregivers.
  • Alzheimer's Foundation of America (AFA) Helpline 866-232-8484 9:00 am - 9:00 pm ET, seven days a week Licensed social workers providing support, info and referrals. Also text message and web chat. Text: 646-586-5283

In a medical emergency, call 911. More numbers, and what each line does, on the help page.

This page is alzhub.org's plain-English summary of a published study, not the paper itself. It is generated from the record we hold for this study, sourced and linked below — check the original for the full text and methods.

✓ Peer-reviewed alzhub usefulness score 26 out of 100. Health systems and care delivery

Topic: Amyloid, tau and blood-test diagnosis

Amyloid immunotherapy with lecanemab and donanemab has been approved on the basis of statistically significant slowing of cognitive and functional decline in early Alzheimer's disease (1,2). Yet clinicians treating individual patients face the everyday challenge of estimating whether a given patient is declining at the rate that would be expected for them, and whether their trajectory reflects a response to treatment. I argue that this difficulty arises in large part because the field cannot yet routinely stratify patients by tau pathology before treatment, even though tau burden is among the strongest available predictors of both the rate of progression and the magnitude of response to amyloid-targeting therapy. Post-hoc and open-label analyses of the Clarity AD and TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 programmes suggest that patients with absent, low, or medium tau burden may constitute a biologically distinct group in whom amyloid clearance is most likely to permit clinical stabilization or measurable functional gain. These observations remain hypotheses, generated largely from subgroup, open-label, and biomarker data rather than from prospective trials designed to test them I propose that tau status should be given strong consideration in patient selection, that tau-guided selection should be evaluated prospectively, and that the access, reimbursement, and standardization barriers to tau positron emission tomography (PET) - together with the promise of scalable plasma tau biomarkers - be addressed deliberately as the field moves toward tau-informed treatment. One tau PET tracer is currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, and a regulatory decision on a second is anticipated in 2026.

Key findings

Why it matters

This article argues that patients should be selected for amyloid immunotherapy based on their tau burden, since post-hoc and open-label analyses of the Clarity AD and TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 programmes suggest people with absent, low or medium tau may respond best. The author states these observations remain hypotheses from subgroup and open-label data, not from prospective trials designed to test them.

Study details

How this study scored 26/100
How this study's score is builtJournal tier 7 of 10; Journal's citation record 0 of 4; Study design 0 of 12; Strength of evidence 1 of 5; Peer-review validation 10 of 10; How recent 5 of 5; Sample size 0 of 4; Effect reported 0 of 3; Studied in people 0 of 3; Randomised / blinded 0 of 2; Times cited 0 of 7; Citations per year 0 of 5; Impact for its field and year 0 of 6; Cited by studies here 0 of 6; Still being cited 0 of 4; Senior author's track record 1 of 4; Institution's track record 0 of 3; Multi-centre collaboration 0 of 3; Indexed in PubMed 2 of 2; Free to read 0 of 2. Total 26 of 100.26 of 100 points earned74 not earned

Published in a peer-reviewed journal. Scored zero for study design, sample size, effect reported, studied in people and randomised / blinded because the record does not state it.

ComponentPointsWhy
Journal tier 7 / 10 Tier 3 — peer-reviewed journal (The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease)
Journal's citation record 0 / 4 The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease: journal h-index 63 (OpenAlex, 2026-10-29)
Study design 0 / 12 Design recorded as “post-hoc analysis”, which our rubric does not rank (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Strength of evidence 1 / 5 Rated “low” in our summary
Peer-review validation 10 / 10 Peer-reviewed. Published as an article in a named peer-reviewed journal.
How recent 5 / 5 2026 — within 1 year(s) of the newest study here
Sample size 0 / 4 Participant count not stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Effect reported 0 / 3 No effect size reported — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Studied in people 0 / 3 Not stated whether this was studied in people — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Randomised / blinded 0 / 2 No randomisation or blinding stated — scores zero (not stated in the record — scored 0)
Times cited 0 / 7 Cited 0 times (OpenAlex, 2026-10-17)
Citations per year 0 / 5 0.0 citations a year over 2 year(s) since 2026
Impact for its field and year 0 / 6 Cited 0.0× the average for papers of its field and year (OpenAlex FWCI)
Cited by studies here 0 / 6 No other study in this library cites it
Still being cited 0 / 4 Cited 0 times in 2024–2026 (2026 still in progress; OpenAlex)
Senior author's track record 1 / 4 Last-listed author Eric Dinnerstein: h-index 6 (OpenAlex, whole career)
Institution's track record 0 / 3 The University of Texas at Tyler: institution h-index 140 (OpenAlex)
Multi-centre collaboration 0 / 3 OpenAlex lists 1 institution(s) in 1 country — scores zero (affiliation lists can be incomplete)
Indexed in PubMed 2 / 2 Indexed in PubMed (PMID 42594414)
Free to read 0 / 2 Behind a paywall — scores zero
Total 26 / 100 —

What each of these 20 components measures, and what this score is not →

Read the original

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

Cite this study APA, Vancouver, BibTeX · download .bib or .ris

Built from the record alzhub holds for this paper, not looked up. Volume, issue and page numbers are not held in the record. Check the citation against the original before you use it.

APA 7th

Eric, D. (2026). The missing improvers: Tau pathology, neuroplasticity, and the case for tau-informed patient selection before amyloid immunotherapy. The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100653

Vancouver

Eric D. The missing improvers: Tau pathology, neuroplasticity, and the case for tau-informed patient selection before amyloid immunotherapy. The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease. 2026. doi:10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100653. PMID: 42594414.

BibTeX

@article{eric2026-42594414,
  author  = {Eric, Dinnerstein},
  title   = {{The missing improvers: Tau pathology, neuroplasticity, and the case for tau-informed patient selection before amyloid immunotherapy}},
  journal = {The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease},
  year    = {2026},
  doi     = {10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100653},
  pmid    = {42594414},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2026.100653}
}

Related studies in Health systems and care delivery

Similar studies

More on Health systems and care delivery

See all studies in Health systems and care delivery →