The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale

Topic: Risk, prevention and care in population studies

We conducted two studies with medically hospitalized cancer and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients to assess the reliability and validity of a new measure of delirium severity, the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale (MDAS). The first study used multiple raters who jointly administered the MDAS to 33 patients, 17 of whom met DSM III-R/DSM IV criteria for delirium, 8 met diagnostic criteria for another cognitive impairment disorder (for example, dementia), and 8 had non-cognitive psychiatric disorders (for example, adjustment disorder). Results indicate high levels of inter-rater reliability for the MDAS (0.92) and the individual MDAS items (ranging from 0.64 to 0.99), as well as high levels of internal consistency (coefficient alpha = 0.91). Mean MDAS ratings differed significantly between delirious patients and the comparison sample of patients with other cognitive impairment disorders or no cognitive impairment (P < 0.0002). The second study compared MDAS ratings of 51 medically hospitalized delirious patients with cancer and AIDS made by one clinician to ratings on several other measures of delirium (Delirium Rating Scale, clinician's ratings of delirium severely) and cognitive functioning (Mini-Mental State Examination) made by a second clinician. Results demonstrated a high correlation between MDAS scores and ratings on the Delirium Rating Scale (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001), the Mini-Mental State Examination (r = -0.91, P < 0.0001), and clinician's global ratings of delirium severity (r = 0.89, P < 0.0001). Thus, our findings indicate that the MDAS is a brief, reliable tool for assessing delirium severity among medically ill populations that can be reliably scored by multiple raters. The MDAS is highly correlated with existing measures of delirium and cognitive impairment, yet offers several advantages over these instruments for repeated assessments which are often necessary in clinical research.

Key findings

• Results indicate high levels of inter-rater reliability for the MDAS (0.92) and the individual MDAS items (ranging from 0.64 to 0.99), as well as high levels of internal consistency (coefficient alpha = 0.91).
• Mean MDAS ratings differed significantly between delirious patients and the comparison sample of patients with other cognitive impairment disorders or no cognitive impairment (P < 0.0002).
• Results demonstrated a high correlation between MDAS scores and ratings on the Delirium Rating Scale (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001), the Mini-Mental State Examination (r = -0.91, P < 0.0001), and clinician's global ratings of delirium severity (r = 0.89, P < 0.0001).
• Thus, our findings indicate that the MDAS is a brief, reliable tool for assessing delirium severity among medically ill populations that can be reliably scored by multiple raters.

Study details

• Participants33
• Evidence strengthLow

Read the original

• DOI: 10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00316-8
• PubMed: 9114631
• Original source →

Free copy unknown: no free-copy check has an answer for this record yet. That does not mean it is paywalled.

@article{breitbart1997-9114631,
  author  = {Breitbart, W. and Rosenfeld, B. and Roth, A. and Smith, M. J. and Cohen, K. and Passik, S.},
  title   = {{The Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale}},
  journal = {Journal of pain and symptom management},
  year    = {1997},
  doi     = {10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00316-8},
  pmid    = {9114631},
  url     = {https://doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(96)00316-8}
}

Related studies in Clinical safety

• The 3-Minute Diagnostic Confusion Assessment Method severity score correlates with the Delirium Rating Scale–Revised–98 and with biomarkers of delirium BJA Open · 2025-04-21 · usefulness score 50/100
• Feasibility and reliability of four pain self-assessment scales and correlation with an observational rating scale in hospitalized elderly demented patients The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2005-04-01 · usefulness score 53/100
• Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the PAINAD Scale: An Extended Application of Pain Assessment in the Moderately Severe Stage of Dementia Siriraj Medical Journal/San Sirirat · 2025-01-01 · usefulness score 29/100
• Poststroke delirium incidence and outcomes: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) Critical care medicine · 2012-02-01 · usefulness score 64/100
• The economic cost of delirium: A systematic review and quality assessment Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2021-01-21 · usefulness score 64/100
• Better Assessment of Illness Study (BASIL) II for Delirium Severity: Study Design, Variables, and Methods Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology · 2025-05-16 · usefulness score 46/100

Similar studies

• Delirium and long-term cognitive impairment 2009 · Clinical safety
• Delirium in elderly patients 2004 · Clinical safety
• Validation of a cognitive test for delirium in medical ICU patients 1996 · Clinical safety
• Calculating cognitive decline in delirium 2014 · Risk factors
• Delirium and dementia: diagnostic criteria and fatality rates 1982 · Clinical safety
• Postoperative delirium 2019 · Clinical safety

More on Clinical safety

• A review that covers this ground Delirium in patients with cancer: assessment, impact, mechanisms and management Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2014-09-02 · usefulness score 36/100
• Newest in this subject Short-Horizon Metrics and the Persistence of Capacity-Debiting Practices in Nursing Homes Preprints.org · 2026-10-13 · Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed · usefulness score 16/100
• Newest in this subject Expert-Derived Components of Person-Centred Nursing Intervention for People with Dementia and/or Cognitive Impairment in a Hospital Experiencing Distress Research Square · 2026-09-29 · Preprint — not yet peer-reviewed · usefulness score 16/100

See all studies in Clinical safety →